| A note on the Berry-Meekings style metric |
| Full text |
Pdf
(320 KB)
|
Source
|
Communications of the ACM
archive
Volume 29 , Issue 2 (February 1986)
table of contents
Pages: 123 - 125
Year of Publication: 1986
ISSN:0001-0782
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 14, Citation Count: 6
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A modification of the Berry-Meekings "style metric"—applied to software from the corporate environment—finds little relationship between this style metric and error proneness.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Gordon. R. Measuring improvements in program clarity. IEEE Softw. Eng. SE-5, 2 (Mar. 1979). 79-90. Applies Halstead's Effort measure to several sample program pairs published in "programming style" texts. The "improved" version of the programs had smaller E measures.
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
McCabe, T. A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-(Dec. 1976). 308-320. Describes a popular, graph theoretic based control flow software complexity metric. Its simple implementation is the number of decisions in the program plus one.
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
REVIEW
"Murat M. Tanik : Reviewer"
Berry and Meekings have defined a style metric based on how closely a program
conforms to a given set of style rules [1]. In their conclusion, they stated
that “. . . we are happy to enter into correspondence with interested
parties whose
more...
|