| COUGAR: the network is the database |
| Full text |
Pdf
(102 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
table of contents
Madison, Wisconsin
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Networks applications
table of contents
Pages: 621 - 621
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-497-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 62, Citation Count: 5
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The widespread distribution and availability of small-scale sensors, actuators, and embedded processors is transforming the physical world into a computing platform. One such example is a sensor network consisting of a large number of sensor nodes that combine physical sensing capabilities such as temperature, light, or seismic sensors with networking and computation capabilities [1]. Applications range from environmental control, warehouse inventory, health care to military environments. Existing sensor networks assume that the sensors are preprogrammed and send data to a central frontend where the data is aggregated and stored for offfsline querying and analysis. This approach has two major draw-backs. First, the user cannot change the behavior of the system on the fly. Second, communication in today's networks is orders of magnitude more expensive than local computation, thus in-network processing can vastly reduce resource usage and thus extend the lifetime of a sensor network.This demo demonstrates a database approach to unite the seemingly conflicting requirements of scalability and flexibility in monitoring the physical world. We demonstrate the COUGAR System, a new distributed data management infrastructure that scales with the growth of sensor interconnectivity and computational power on the sensors over the next decades. Our system resides directly on the sensor nodes and creates the abstraction of a single processing node without centralizing data or computation.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Deborah Estrin , Ramesh Govindan , John Heidemann , Satish Kumar, Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.263-270, August 15-19, 1999, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/313451.313556]
|
 |
2
|
Jason Hill , Robert Szewczyk , Alec Woo , Seth Hollar , David Culler , Kristofer Pister, System architecture directions for networked sensors, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.35 n.11, p.93-104, Nov. 2000
[doi> 10.1145/356989.356998]
|
 |
3
|
Chalermek Intanagonwiwat , Ramesh Govindan , Deborah Estrin, Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks, Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.56-67, August 06-11, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
[doi> 10.1145/345910.345920]
|
| |
4
|
S. C. www.sensoria.com. Wins ng 2.0 user guide. White paper, July 2001.
|
CITED BY 5
|
|
Yang Yu , Loren J. Rittle , Vartika Bhandari , Jason B. LeBrun, Supporting concurrent applications in wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, October 31-November 03, 2006, Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
|
|
Bo Sheng , Qun Li , Weizhen Mao , Wen Jin, Outlier detection in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, September 09-14, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|