ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Workflow management with service quality guarantees
Full text PdfPdf (1.29 MB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Madison, Wisconsin
SESSION: Research sessions: potpourri table of contents
Pages: 228 - 239  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-497-5
Authors
Michael Gillmann  business solutions AG
Gerhard Weikum  University of the Saarland
Wolfgang Wonner  University of the Saarland
Sponsor
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/564691.564718
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Workflow management systems (WFMS) that are geared for the orchestration of business processes across multiple organizations are complex distributed systems: they consist of multiple workflow engines, application servers, and communication middleware servers such as ORBs, where each of these server types can be replicated on multiple computers for scalability and availability.Finding an appropriate system configuration with guaranteed application-specific quality of service in terms of throughput, response time, and tolerable downtime is a major challenge for human system administrators. This paper presents a tool that largely automates the task of configuring a distributed WFMS. Based on a suite of mathematical models, the tool derives the necessary degrees of replication for the various server types in order to meet specified goals for performance and availability as well as "performability" when service is degraded due to outages of individual servers. The paper describes the configuration tool, with emphasis on how to capture the load behavior of workflows in a realistic manner. We also present extensive experiments that evaluate the accuracy of the tool's underlying models and demonstrate the practical feasibility of automating the task of configuring a distributed WFMS. The experiments use a detailed simulation which in turn has been validated through measurements with the Mentor-lite prototype system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Alonso, D. Agrawal, A. El Abbadi, C. Mohan, Functionality and Limitations of Current Workflow Management Systems, IEEE Expert, 12(5), 1997
 
2
 
3
T Bauer, P. Dadam, Distribution Models for Workflow Management Systems - Classification and Simulation (in German), Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung, 14(4), Springer, 1999
 
4
Mesquite Software Homepage, http://www.mesquite.com
 
5
Data Engineering Bulletin Special Issue on Infrastructure for Advanced E-Services, 24(1), 2001
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
IONA Technologies PLC, User Manuals of Orbix 2.3, 1997
 
13
 
14
 
15
A. Lazcano, G. Alonso, H. Schuldt, C. Schuler, The WISE approach to Electronic Commerce, Int'l. Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 15(5), 2000
 
16
F. Leymann, D. Roller, Production Workflow, Prentice Hall, 1999
 
17
P. Mills, C. Loosley, A Performance Analysis of 40 e-Business Web Sites, White Paper, Keynote Systems Inc., 2001
 
18
 
19
20
 
21
 
22
H. C. Tijms, Stochastic Models, John Wiley and Sons, 1994
 
23
Transaction Processing Performance Council, http://www.tpc.org
 
24
J. Weissenfels, M. Gillmann, O. Roth, G. Shegalov, W. Wonner, The Mentor-lite Prototype: A Light-Weight Workflow Management System, ICDE, California, 2000

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Gillmann: colleagues
Gerhard Weikum: colleagues
Wolfgang Wonner: colleagues