ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Novelty and redundancy detection in adaptive filtering
Full text PdfPdf (578 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Tampere, Finland
SESSION: Filtering table of contents
Pages: 81 - 88  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-561-0
Authors
Yi Zhang  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Jamie Callan  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Thomas Minka  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 173,   Citation Count: 55
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/564376.564393
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the problem of extending an adaptive information filtering system to make decisions about the novelty and redundancy of relevant documents. It argues that relevance and redundance should each be modelled explicitly and separately. A set of five redundancy measures are proposed and evaluated in experiments with and without redundancy thresholds. The experimental results demonstrate that the cosine similarity metric and a redundancy measure based on a mixture of language models are both effective for identifying redundant documents.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Allan, J. Carbonell, G. Doddington, J. Yamron, and Y. Yang. Topic detection and tracking pilot study. In Topic Detection and Tracking Workshop Report 2001.
2
3
 
4
J. Carbonell, Y. Yang, R. Brown, C. Jin, and J. Zhang. CMU TDT report 13-- 14 Nov 2001. In Topic Detection and Tracking Workshop Report 2001.
 
5
M. Franz, A. Ittycheriah, J. S. McCarley, andT. Ward. First story detection: Combining similarity and novelty based approaches. In Topic Detection and Tracking Workshop Report 2001.
 
6
W. P. Jones and G. W. Furnas. Pictures of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1987.
 
7
W. Kraaij, R. Pohlmann, and D. Hiemstra. Twenty- one at TREC- 8: using language technology for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC- 8) , 1999.
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
S. Robertson. Threshold setting in adaptive filtering. Journal of Documentation 2000.
 
12
S. Robertson and D. Hull. The TREC- 9 Filtering track report. In The Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC- 9) , 2001.
 
13
M. Spitters and W. Kraaij. TNO at TDT2001: Language model-based topic detection. In Topic Detection and Tracking Workshop Report. 2001.
14
 
15
J. Yamron, S. Knecht, and P. van Mulbregt. Dragon's tracking and detection systems for the TDT2000 evaluation. In Proceedings of the Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop 1998.
16
17
18

CITED BY  55

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yi Zhang: colleagues
Jamie Callan: colleagues
Thomas Minka: colleagues