|
ABSTRACT
The optimal settings of retrieval parameters often depend on both the document collection and the query, and are usually found through empirical tuning. In this paper, we propose a family of two-stage language models for information retrieval that explicitly captures the different influences of the query and document collection on the optimal settings of retrieval parameters. As a special case, we present a two-stage smoothing method that allows us to estimate the smoothing parameters completely automatically. In the first stage, the document language model is smoothed using a Dirichlet prior with the collection language model as the reference model. In the second stage, the smoothed document language model is further interpolated with a query background language model. We propose a leave-one-out method for estimating the Dirichlet parameter of the first stage, and the use of document mixture models for estimating the interpolation parameter of the second stage. Evaluation on five different databases and four types of queries indicates that the two-stage smoothing method with the proposed parameter estimation methods consistently gives retrieval performance that is close to---or better than---the best results achieved using a single smoothing method and exhaustive parameter search on the test data.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Hiemstra, D. and Kraaij, W. (1998). Twenty-one at TREC-7: Ad-hoc and cross-language track. In Proc. of Seventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7).
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
John Lafferty , Chengxiang Zhai, Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval, Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.111-119, September 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
[doi> 10.1145/383952.383970]
|
| |
5
|
Lafferty, J. and Zhai, C. (2001b). Probabilistic IR models based on query and document generation. In Proceedings of the Language Modeling and IR workshop. Extended abstract.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
David R. H. Miller , Tim Leek , Richard M. Schwartz, A hidden Markov model information retrieval system, Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.214-221, August 15-19, 1999, Berkeley, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/312624.312680]
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Robertson, S. and Sparck Jones, K. (1976). Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27:129--146.
|
| |
11
|
Robertson, S. E., Walker, S., Jones, S., M.Hancock-Beaulieu, M., and Gatford, M. (1995). Okapi at TREC-3. In Harman, D. K., editor, The Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3).
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Voorhees, E. and Harman, D., editors (2001). Proceedings of Text REtrieval Conference (TREC1-9). NIST Special Publications. http://trec.nist.gov/pubs.html.
|
| |
16
|
Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. (2001a). Model-based feedback in the KL-divergence retrieval model. In Tenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2001).
|
 |
17
|
|
CITED BY 42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas R. Lynam , Chris Buckley , Charles L. A. Clarke , Gordon V. Cormack, A multi-system analysis of document and term selection for blind feedback, Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, November 08-13, 2004, Washington, D.C., USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xiaohua Zhou , Xiaohua Hu , Xiaodan Zhang , Xia Lin , Il-Yeol Song, Context-sensitive semantic smoothing for the language modeling approach to genomic IR, Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 06-11, 2006, Seattle, Washington, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|