Teaching tools and methods: GeNisa: a web-based interactive learning environment for teaching simulation modelling

ABSTRACT

Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) provide students with adaptive instruction and can facilitate the acquisition of problem solving skills in an interactive environment. This paper discusses the role of pedagogical strategies that have been implemented to facilitate the development of simulation modelling knowledge. The learning environment integrates case-based reasoning with interactive tools to guide tutorial remediation. The evaluation of the system shows that the model for pedagogical activities is a useful method for providing efficient simulation modelling instruction.

REFERENCES

• 1: Atolagbe, T., and Hlupic, V. 2001. GeNisa: A Generic Architecture for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Submitted to International Journal for Artificial Intelligence in Education.
• 2: Atolagbe, T. and Hlupic, V. 1998. A Conceptual Model for An Internet Based Intelligent Tutoring System for Simulation Modelling. In Proceedings of 10th European Simulation Symposium and Exhibition. Bargiela, A. and Kerckhoffs, E. (Eds.), Nottingham, 692-694.
• 3: Atolagbe. A. T. and Hlupic, V. 1997. A Reusable Architecture for Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Teaching Simulation Modelling. In the Proceedings of the 9th European Symposium on Simulation in Industry Conference. Kaylan, A. R. and Lehmann, A. (Eds.) Passau, 187-192.
• 4: Van de velde Breuker, Common KADS Library for Expertise Modelling, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994
• 5: Brusilovsky, P. 1998. Adaptive Educational Systems on the World-Wide-Web: A Review of Available Technologies. In Proceedings of Workshop WWW-based Tutoring of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems , San Antonio, TX.
• 6: Peter Brusilovsky , Elmar W. Schwarz , Gerhard Weber, ELM-ART: An Intelligent Tutoring System on World Wide Web, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, p.261-269, June 12-14, 1996
• 7: Bryman, A. and Cramer, D. 1997. Quantitative Data Analysis. London. Routledge.
• 8: Chi, M. T. H. 2000. Self-Explaining: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In Glaser, R. (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 161-238.
• 9: Cronbach, L. J. and Snow R. E. 1977. Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. Irvington, New York.
• 10: Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K., and Druzdzel, M., 1997. On-line student modeling for Coached problem solving using Bayesian Networks. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on User Modelling, 231-242.
• 11: Brad J Cox, Object oriented programming: an evolutionary approach, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1986
• 12: Dieterich, H., Malinowski, U., Kühme, T. and SchneiderHufschmidt, M. 1993. State of the Art in Adaptive User Interfaces. In SchneiderHufschmidt, M., Kühme T. and Malinowski, U. (Eds.), Adaptive User Interfaces: Principles and Practice. Amsterdam, 13-48.
• 13: Howell, F. W. 1997. The Simjava User Manual. University of Edinburg.
• 14: James C. Lester , Brian A. Stone , Gary D. Stelling, Lifelike Pedagogical Agents for Mixed-initiative Problem Solving in Constructivist Learning Environments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, v.9 n.1-2, p.1-44, April 1999 [doi>10.1023/A:1008374607830]
• 15: Mark, M. A. and Greer, J. E. 1993. Evaluation Methodologies for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4: 129-153.
• 16: Murray, T. 1999. Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the State of the Art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(1): 98-129.
• 17: Tom Murray, Having It All, Maybe: Design Tradeoffs in ITS Authoring Tools, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, p.93-101, June 12-14, 1996
• 18: Ohlsson, S. 1993. Impact of Cognitive Theory on the Practice of Courseware Authoring, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9(4): 194-221.
• 19: Paul, R. J., Taylor, S. J. E., Hlupic, V., and Baldwin, L. P. 1998. A Methodology for the Integration of Computer-Based Training into Simulation Modelling Courses. Proceedings of European Simulation Conference, Bargiela, A and Kerckhoffs, E. (Eds.), Nottingham, 709-714.
• 20: Judea Pearl, Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1988
• 21: Rickel, J., and Johnson, W. L. 1999. Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13: 343-382.
• 22: Steven Ritter , Kenneth R. Koedinger, An architecture for plug-in tutor agents, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, v.7 n.3-4, p.315-347, 1996
• 23: VanLehn, K. 1996. Cognitive Skill Acquisition. In Spence, J., Darly, J., and Foss, D. J. (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA., 47: 513-539.
• 24: Etienne Wenger, Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1987
• 25: Bernard P. Zeigler, Object-oriented modeling and discrete-event simulation, Advances in computers, Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1991

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education
          Subjects: Computer-assisted instruction (CAI)

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.7 Simulation Support Systems
          Subjects: Environments

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Algorithms, Human Factors, Performance