ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using simulation and neural networks to develop a scheduling advisor
Full text PdfPdf (182 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia
SESSION: Manufacturing applications table of contents
Pages: 954 - 958  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:0-7803-7309-X
Authors
Thanos Alifantis  University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
Stewart Robinson  University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SCS : The Society for Computer Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

The research using artificial intelligence and computer simulation introduces a new approach for solving the job shop-scheduling problem. The new approach is based on the development of a neural network-scheduling advisor, which is trained using optimal scheduling decisions. The data set, which is used to train the neural network, is obtained from simulation experiments with small-scale job shop scheduling problems. The paper formulates the problem and after a review of the current solution methods it describes the steps of a new methodology for developing the neural network-scheduling advisor and collecting the data required for its training. The paper concludes by mentioning the expected findings that can be used to evaluate the degree of success of the new methodology.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Carvalho, M. Dougherty, M. Fowkers, A. Wardman, M. R. Forecasting Travel Demand: A comparison of logit and artificial neural network methods. Journal of Operational Research Society. 1998; 49717-722.
 
2
Curram, S. Representing intelligent decision making in discrete event simulation. PhD Thesis University of Warwick; 1997.
 
3
Flitman, A. Towards the application of artificial intelligence techniques for discrete event simulation. PhD Thesis University of Warwick; 1986.
 
4
Flitman, A.M. Hurrion, R. D. Linking discrete-event simulation models with expert systems. Journal of Operational Research Society. 1987; 38(8):723-733.
 
5
Gupta, A. Lam, M.S. Estimating Missing Values Using Neural Networks. Journal of Operational Research Society. 1996 Feb; 47(2):229-238.
 
6
Hurrion, R. The design use and required facilities of an interactive visual simulation language to explore production planning problems. PhD thesis University of London; 1976.
 
7
Hurrion, R. Visual interactive simulation system an aid to decision making. Omega. 1978a; 6.
 
8
Hurrion, R. An investigation of visual interactive simulation methods using the job-shop scheduling problem. Journal of operational Research Society. 1978b; 29.
 
9
Hurrion, R. An interactive visual simulation system for industrial management. European Journal of Operational Research. 1980; 31.
 
10
Hurrion, R. Visual interactive modeling. European Journal of Operational Research. 1986; 23.
 
11
Liang Moskowitz Yih. Integrating neural networks and semi-markov processes for automated knowledge acquisition an application to real time scheduling. Decision Science. 1992; 23.
 
12
 
13
Pierreval Ralambondrainy. A simulation learning technique for generating knowledge about manufacturing systems behavior. Journal Of Operational Research Society. 1990; 41.
 
14
 
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thanos Alifantis: colleagues
Stewart Robinson: colleagues