ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Modelling and improving human decision making with simulation
Full text PdfPdf (256 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia
SESSION: Manufacturing applications table of contents
Pages: 913 - 920  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:0-7803-7309-X
Authors
Stewart Robinson  University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK
Thanos Alifantis  University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK
Robert Hurrion  University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK
John Ladbrook  Dunton Engineering Centre, (15/4A-F04-D), Laindon, Basildon, Ford Motor Company, Essex, SS15 6EE, UK
John Edwards  Aston University, Birmingham, B47ET, UK
Tony Waller  The Oaks, Clews Road, Lanner Group, Redditch, Worcs, B98 7ST, UK
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SCS : The Society for Computer Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Modelling human interaction and decision-making within a simulation presents a particular challenge. This paper describes a methodology that is being developed known as 'knowledge based improvement'. The purpose of this methodology is to elicit decision-making strategies via a simulation model and to represent them using artificial intelligence techniques. Further to this, having identified an individual's decision-making strategy, the methodology aims to look for improvements in decision-making. The methodology is being tested on unplanned maintenance operations at a Ford engine assembly plant.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Flitman A. M. and Hurrion, R. D. (1987). Linking Discrete-Event Simulation Models with Expert Systems. J. Opl Res. Soc.,38 (8), pp. 723-734.
 
2
Hart, A. (1987). Role of Induction in Knowledge Elicitation. In Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems: a Practical Handbook, ed. A. Kidd, 165-189. New York: Plenum.
 
3
Ladbrook, J. (1998). Modeling Breakdowns: An Inquest. MPhil Thesis, University of Birmingham.
 
4
Lanner Group (2000). WITNESS 2000 User Manual. The Oaks, Clews Road, Redditch, UK.
 
5
Lyu, J. and Gunasekaran A. (1997). An Intelligent Simulation Model to Evaluate Scheduling Strategies in a Steel Company. International Journal of Systems Science,28 (6), pp. 611-616.
 
6
Mingers, J. (1986). Expert Systems: Experiments with Rule Induction. J. Opl Res. Soc.,37 (11), pp. 1031-1037.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Robinson, S., Edwards, J. S. and Yongfa, W. (2001). Linking WITNESS to an Expert System to Represent a Decision-Making Process. Simulation (in review).
 
10
 
11
Williams, T. (1996). Simulating the Man-in-the-Loop. OR Insight,9 (4), pp. 17-21.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stewart Robinson: colleagues
Thanos Alifantis: colleagues
Robert Hurrion: colleagues
John Ladbrook: colleagues
John Edwards: colleagues
Tony Waller: colleagues