ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Saving energy with architectural and frequency adaptations for multimedia applications
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (1.28 MB)
Source International Symposium on Microarchitecture archive
Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on Microarchitecture table of contents
Austin, Texas
SESSION: Multimedia and graphics table of contents
Pages: 250 - 261  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN ~ ISSN:1072-4451 , 0-7695-1369-7
Authors
Christopher J. Hughes  University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Jayanth Srinivasan  University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Sarita V. Adve  University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Sponsors
: IEEE TC-MARCH
SIGMICRO: ACM Special Interest Group on Microarchitectural Research and Processing
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 27
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

General-purpose processors are expected to be increasingly employed for multimedia workloads on systems where reducing energy consumption is an important goal. Researchers have proposed the use of two forms of hardware adaptation - architectural adaptation and dynamic voltage (and frequency) scaling or DVS - to reduce energy. This paper develops and evaluates an integrated algorithm to control both architectural adaptation and DVS targeted to multimedia applications. It also examines the interaction between the two forms of adaptation, identifying when each will perform better in isolation and when the addition of architectural adaptation will benefit DVS.Our adaptation control algorithm is effective in saving energy and exploits most of the available potential. For the applications and systems studied, DVS is consistently better than architectural adaptation in isolation. The addition of architectural adaptation to DVS benefits some applications, but not all. Finally, in a seemingly counter-intuitive result, we find that while less aggressive architectures reduce energy for fixed frequency hardware, with DVS, more aggressive architectures are often more energy efficient.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
G. Blalock. Microprocessors Outperform DSPs 2:1. Microprocessor Report, December 1996.
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
D. Folegnani and A. Gonzalez. Energy-Efficient Issue Logic. In Proc. of the 28th Annual Intl. Symp. on Comp. Architecture, 2001.
 
9
S. Ghiasi, J. Casmira, and D. Grunwald. Using IPC Variation in Workloads with Externally Specified Rates to Reduce Power Consumption. In Proc. of the Workshop on Complexity-Effective Design, 2000.
10
 
11
D. Grunwald et al. Policies for Dynamic Clock Scheduling. In Proc. of the 4th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 2000.
 
12
T. R. Halfhill. Transmeta Breaks x86 Low-Power Barrier. Microprocessor Report, February 2000.
13
14
 
15
C. J. Hughes, J. Srinivasan, and S. V. Adve. Supplemental Data for "Saving Energy with Architectural and Frequency Adaptations for Multimedia Applications". URL: http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/rsim/Pubs/micro34-supplement.ps.
 
16
Intel XScale Microarchitecture. http://developer.intel.com/design/intelxscale/benchmarks.htm.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
22
 
23
 
24
V. S. Pai, P. Ranganathan, and S. V. Adve. RSIM Reference Manual version 1.0. Technical Report 9705, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, August 1997.
25
26
27
28
 
29
M. Weiser et al. Scheduling for Reduced CPU Energy. In Proc. of the 1st Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 1994.

CITED BY  27
Collaborative Colleagues:
Christopher J. Hughes: colleagues
Jayanth Srinivasan: colleagues
Sarita V. Adve: colleagues