A gimmick to integrate software testing throughout the curriculum

ABSTRACT

We discuss our experiences in which students of a programming course were asked to submit both an implementation as well as a test set. A portion of a student's grade was then devoted both to the validity of a student's program on others' test sets, as well as how that student's test set performed in uncovering flaws in others' programs. The advantages are many, as this introduces implicit principles of software testing together with a bit of fun competition. The major complication is that such an all-pairs execution of tests grows quadratically with the number of participants, necessitating a fully automated scoring system.

REFERENCES

• 1: ACM/IEEE-CS Joing Task Force. Computing Curricula 2001, Aug. 1, 2001. Steelman Draft.
• 2: Ryan S. Baker , Michael Boilen , Michael T. Goodrich , Roberto Tamassia , B. Aaron Stibel, Testers and visualizers for teaching data structures, The proceedings of the thirtieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.261-265, March 24-28, 1999, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
• 3: Judith L. Gersting, A software engineering “frosting” on a traditional CS-1 course, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, p.233-237, March 10-12, 1994, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
• 4: Michael T. Goodrich , Roberto Tamassia, Data Structures and Algorithms in Java with Cdrom, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1998
• 5: Thomas B. Hilburn, Software Engineering - From the Beginning, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Software Engineering Education, p.29, April 21-24, 1996
• 6: Thomas B. Hilburn , Massood Townhidnejad, Software quality: a curriculum postscript?, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.167-171, March 07-12, 2000, Austin, Texas, United States
• 7: Lewis E. Hitchner, An automatic testing and grading method for a C++ list class, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.31 n.2, June 1999 [doi>10.1145/571535.571567]
• 8: David Jackson , Michelle Usher, Grading student programs using ASSYST, Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.335-339, February 27-March 01, 1997, San Jose, California, United States
• 9: Ursula Jackson , Bill Z. Manaris , Renée A. McCauley, Strategies for effective integration of software engineering concepts and techniques into the undergraduate computer science curriculum, Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.360-364, February 27-March 01, 1997, San Jose, California, United States
• 10: Edward L. Jones, Grading student programs - a software testing approach, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.16 n.2, p.185-192, Jan. 2001
• 11: Edward L. Jones, Integrating testing into the curriculum — arsenic in small doses, Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education, p.337-341, February 2001, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
• 12: David G. Kay , Terry Scott , Peter Isaacson , Kenneth A. Reek, Automated grading assistance for student programs, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, p.381-382, March 10-12, 1994, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
• 13: Renée A. McCauley , Clark Archer , Nell Dale , Rym Mili , James Robergé , Harriet Taylor, The effective integration of software engineering principles throughout the undergraduate computer science curriculum (abstract), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.364-365, March 02-04, 1995, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
• 14: Reneée McCauley , Nell Dale , Thomas Hilburn , Susan Mengel , Branson W. Murrill, The assimilation of software engineering into the undergraduate computer science curriculum (panel session), Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.423-424, March 07-12, 2000, Austin, Texas, United States
• 15: McCauley, R., and Jackson, U. Teaching software engineering early --- experiences and results. In Proceedings of the 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference (Tempe, Arizona, Nov. 1998), pp. 800-804.
• 16: Roy P. Pargas , Joe C. Lundy , John N. Underwood, Tournament play in CS1, Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.214-218, February 27-March 01, 1997, San Jose, California, United States
• 17: Kenneth A. Reek, The TRY system -or- how to avoid testing student programs, Proceedings of the twentieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.112-116, February 23-24, 1989, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
• 18: James Robergé , Candice Suriano, Using laboratories to teach software engineering principles in the introductory computer science curriculum, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, p.106-110, March 10-12, 1994, Phoenix, Arizona, United States