ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The role and position of graphics in computer science education
Full text PdfPdf (584 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Pages: 232 - 237  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-89791-178-4
Also published in ...
Author
Mark R. Ohlson  Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/5600.5903
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The SIGGRAPH Education Committee has been considering recommendations for inclusion of graphics in various curricula for higher education. Several issues of computer graphics in computer science or computer science/engineering curricula are identified here. In particular the course content and support facilities necessary and the status of graphics courses within programs are discussed. A basic premise is stated that Curriculum '78[1] and other guidelines[2, 3, 4, 5, 6] for educational programs are flawed in their lack of computer graphics content. The reasons for this are not immediately apparent, but might in part be attributed to the lower profile of graphics during the time of their initial development. Since that time the significant technical advancements and standardization of terms and concepts have not been incorporated as changes in recommended curricula designs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
ACM Education Board. "ACM Curricula: Recommendations for Computer Science (V. i)". New York, 1983.
3
 
4
T. Booth. "The IEEE Computer Society Model Program in Computer Science and Engineering". Proceedings of the 1983 Frontiers in Education Conference (Worcester, MA, Oct 16-18), 186-190, IEEE Computer Society, 1983.
 
5
J. Cain, G. Langdon Jr., M. Varanasi. "Curriculum Aspects of The IEEE Computer Society Model Program in Computer Science and Engineering". Computer, Volume 17, Number 4 (April, 1984), 8-17.
6
 
7
C.Machover. "A Brief, Personal History of Computer Graphics" Computer, Volume ii, Number ii (November, 1978), 38-45.
 
8
W.Meyers. "Interactive Computer Graphics: Flying High" Computer, Volume 12, Number 7,8 (July, August, 1979).
9
 
10
W. Meyers. "Computer Graphics: The Next 20 Years". IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Volume 5, Number 8 (August, 1985).
11
 
12
Computing Sciences Accreditation Board. "Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Computer Science in the United States" CSAB, New York, September 25, 1984.
 
13
T. Booth. "Accreditation Issues in Computer Science and Engineering". Proceedings of the 1983 Frontiers in Education conference (Worcester, MA, Oct 16-18), 181-185, IEEE Computer Society, 1983.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
P. Green. "Teaching a Course on Human Factors and Computer Systems". IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Volume 4, Number 2 (December 1984), 43-45.
 
19
T. Ting, j. Coggins, M. Ohlson. "A Multi-Sensory and Multi-Media Laboratory for Human-Computer Interaction". Proceedings of IEEE 1984 Workshop on Visual Languages, Hiroshima, Japan, December 1984.
20



REVIEW

"Lyle Benson Smith : Reviewer"

This short paper suggests that a graphics course should be added to ACM Curriculum '78 [1]. Alternatively, the author suggests two courses: a human-computer interaction course that includes introductory graphics and a graphics algorithms course   more...