The future of computer languages: implications for education

ABSTRACT

Which computer languages should we be teaching our students — and why? This paper examines the multitude of languages now available from three perspectives: classificatory, predictive, and pedagogical. It offers a “linguistic” analysis of computer languages in terms of their structure, their function, and their genealogy. Using these classifications, the paper then analyzes current and future trends for each language type. The classifications and predictions suggest a fundamental distinction between two sorts of languages: those appropriate for public computing (i.e. programming done by most professional computer scientists) and those appropriate for private computing (computing by individuals for their own purposes). The paper suggests that while would-be computer scientists need to learn public computing languages, private computing languages may be especially appropriate for non-professional computer users.

REFERENCES

• 1: Baron, Naomi S. (1986). Computer Languages: An Exollorer'~Guide. New York: Doubleday.
• 2: Jean Ichbiah, ADA:: past, present, future, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.10, p.990-997, Oct 1984 [doi>10.1145/358274.358278]
• 3: Donald E. Knuth, Structured Programming with go to Statements, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.6 n.4, p.261-301, Dec. 1974 [doi>10.1145/356635.356640]
• 4: Niklaus Wirth, From programming language design to computer construction, Communications of the ACM, v.28 n.2, p.160-164, Feb. 1985 [doi>10.1145/2786.2789]

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  D. Software
  D.3 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION

General Terms:
Human Factors, Languages