ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparative analysis of LISP and APL2
Full text PdfPdf (809 KB)
Source International Conference on APL archive
Proceedings of the international conference on APL table of contents
Sydney, Australia
Pages: 183 - 196  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISBN:0-89791-253-5
Also published in ...
Author
A. Kaneko  IBM Japan, Ltd.
Sponsor
SIGAPL: ACM Special Interest Group on APL Programming Language
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/55626.55651
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

LISP and APL2 were both born in 1960's and they have the similar syntax which is called function type. The main users of LISP were in the universities and the applications were linguistics or formula processing in mathematics. On the other hand APL was used in the companies and many of their applications were in the business environment such as business planning or reporting. Traditional APL provided user intuitive expressions, but it was rather weak in handling character string of variable length or combination of numerics and characters. APL2 and its general array resolved these weak points and it has a great capability to develop AI applications. This paper introduces the similarities between LISP and APL2 and shows how APL2 solves the problem which LISP is good at handling.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Lisp for the beginner Toshinobu Yoshida,Teruo Serizawa Gijutsu Hyoron Sha,Japan 1985