ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Censorship resistant peer-to-peer content addressable networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.05 MB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages: 94 - 103  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:0-89871-513-X
Authors
Amos Fiat  Tel Aviv University, and University of Washington, Seattle
Jared Saia  University of Washington, Seattle
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We present a censorship resistant peer-to-peer Content Addressable Network for accessing n data items in a network of n nodes. Each search for a data item in the network takes O(log n) time and requires at most O(log2n) messages. Our network is censorship resistant in the sense that even after adversarial removal of an arbitrarily large constant fraction of the nodes in the network, all but an arbitrarily small fraction of the remaining nodes can obtain all but an arbitrarily small fraction of the original data items. The network can be created in a fully distributed fashion. It requires only O(log n) memory in each node. We also give a variant of our scheme that has the property that it is highly spam resistant: an adversary can take over complete control of a constant fraction of the nodes in the network and yet will still be unable to generate spam.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Noga Alon and Joel Spencer. The Probabilistic Method, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
 
3
4
 
5
John Borland. Gnutella girds against spam attacks. CNET News.com, August 2000. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2489605.html.
 
6
Clip2. Gnutella: To the bandwidth barrier and beyond. http://dss.clip2.com/gnutella.html.
 
7
Electronic Freedom Foundation. Eff --- censorship --- internet censorship legislation & regulation (cda, etc.) --- archive. http://www.eff.org/-pub/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills.
8
9
10
11
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
Aviel D. Rubin Marc Waldman and Lorrie Faith Cranor. Publius: A robust, tamper-evident, censorship-resistant, web publishing system. In Proc. 9th USENIX Security Symposium, pages 59-72, August 2000.
 
16
Robert Marquand. China's web users kept on their toes. http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/-2000/12/07/fp7s1-csm.shtml.
 
17
 
18
Index on Censorship. Index on censorship homepage. http://www.indexoncensorship.org.
 
19
 
20
Gopal Pandurangan, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Eli Upfal. Building low-diameter p2p networks. In STOC 2001, Crete, Greece, 2001.
 
21
M. Pinsker. On the complexity of a concentrator. In 7th International Teletraffic Conference, 1973.
22
23
 
24
Stefan Saroiu, P. Krishna Gummadi, and Steven D. Gribble. A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Proceedings of Multimedia Computing and Networking, 2002.
25
26
 
27
Gnutella website. http://gnutella.wego.com/.
 
28
Napster website. http://www.napster.com/.
 
29

CITED BY  19