|
ABSTRACT
Work to date on computational models of negotiation has focused almost exclusively on defining contracts consisting of one or a few independent issues. Many real-world contracts, by contrast, consist of multiple inter-dependent issues. This paper describes a simulated annealing based approach appropriate for negotiating such complex contracts, evaluates its efficacy, and suggests potentially promising avenues for future work.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Ehtamo, H., E. Ketteunen, and R. Hamalainen, Searching for Joint Gains in Multi-Party Negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001. 1(30): p. 54--69
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Raiffa, H., The art and science of negotiation. 1982, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. x, 373
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Kramer, J. and J. Magee. Analyzing Dynamic Change in Software Architectures. in ICSE98 Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution. 1998. Kyoto, Japan
|
| |
8
|
Sandholm, T.W., Distributed Rational Decision Making, in Multi-Agent Systems, G. Weiss, Editor. 1998
|
| |
9
|
Axelrod, R., The Evolution Of Cooperation. 1984: Basic Books
|
 |
10
|
|
CITED BY 4
|
|
|
|
|
Sarit Kraus , Penina Hoz-Weiss , Jonathan Wilkenfeld , David R. Andersen , Amy Pate, Resolving crises through automated bilateral negotiations, Artificial Intelligence, v.172 n.1, p.1-18, January, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|