ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems
Full text PdfPdf (236 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1 table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Session 2D: group and organizational dynamics table of contents
Pages: 475 - 482  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-480-0
Authors
Jordi Sabater  Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Catalonia, Spain
Carles Sierra  Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Catalonia, Spain
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 59,   Downloads (12 Months): 449,   Citation Count: 43
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/544741.544854
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The use of previous direct interactions is probably the best way to calculate a reputation but, unfortunately this information is not always available. This is especially true in large multi-agent systems where interaction is scarce. In this paper we present a reputation system that takes advantage, among other things, of social relations between agents to overcome this problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Amazon Auctions. http://auctions.amazon.com.
 
2
eBay. http://www.eBay.com.
 
3
 
4
D.B. Bromley. Reputation, Image and Impression Management. John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
 
5
V. Buskens. The social structure of trust. Social Networks, (20):265--298, 1998.
 
6
 
7
M. Celentani, D. Fudenberg, D.K. Levine, and W. Psendorfer. Maintaining a reputation against a long-lived opponent. Econometrica, 64(3):691--704, 1966.
 
8
P. Dasgupta. Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta, editor, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pages 49--72. Blackwell, 1998.
 
9
P. Hage and F. Harary. Structural Models in Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
 
10
P. Hage and F. Harary. Island Networks. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
 
11
M. Karlins and H. Abelson. Persuasion, how opinion and attitudes are changed. Crosby Lockwood & Son, 1970.
 
12
R. Marimon, J.P. Nicolini, and P. Teles. Competition and reputation. In Proceedings of the World Conference Econometric Society, Seattle, 2000.
 
13
 
14
J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, Montreal, Canada, pages 61--69, 2001.
 
15
M. Schillo, P. Funk, and M. Rovatsos. Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societites. In Applied Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Trust, Deception and Fraud in Agent Societies, 2000.
 
16
J. Scott. Social Network Analysis. SAGE Publications, 2000.
 
17
 
18
G. Zacharia. Collaborative reputation mechanisms for online communities. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 1999.
 
19
L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Synthese, 30:407--428, 1975.

CITED BY  43

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jordi Sabater: colleagues
Carles Sierra: colleagues