ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attribute auctions
Full text PdfPdf (292 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1 table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Session 2A: markets and auctions I table of contents
Pages: 77 - 85  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-480-0
Authors
Esther David  Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Rina Azoulay-Schwartz  Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Sarit Kraus  Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 65,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/544741.544761
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we consider a model of a procurement multi-attribute auction in which the sales item is defined by several attributes, the buyer is the auctioneer, and the sellers are the bidders. Such domains include auctions on task allocation, services, or compound items. The buyer announces a scoring rule, according to its preferences, before the auction starts, and each seller places a bid, which describes the attributes of the item it offers for sale.First, we consider a variation of the first-price sealed-bid protocol, and we provide optimal and stable strategies for the buyer agent and for the seller agents participating in the multi-attribute auction. In addition, we analyze the buyer's expected revenue and suggest an optimal scoring rule that can be announced. Second, we consider four variations of the English auction for the case of a multi-attribute item, and we prove that, given some assumptions, they all converge to the same result. We also discuss which variation is preferred for different types of environments. Moreover, we show under which conditions, announcing the truth about buyer preferences is the optimal strategy for the buyer.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Che, Y. K. Design competition through multidimensional auctions, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, 1993, 668--680.
 
4
 
5
Flavio, M. and Monteiro, P. Auctions with endogenous participation, Rev. of Economic Design 5, 2000, 71--89.
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Sandholm, T.W. Limitations of the Vickrey Auction in Computational Multiagent Systems. In proc. of ICMAS-96 1996, 299--306.
 
11
 
12
Walsh, W.E., Wellman, M. P., Wurman, P.R. and MacKie-Mason, J. K. Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. In Proc. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 1998.
 
13
Yoon, K. and Hwang, C. Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 1995.
 
14
A long version of the paper exists at: http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/schwart/papers/Auction-full-paper.doc

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Esther David: colleagues
Rina Azoulay-Schwartz: colleagues
Sarit Kraus: colleagues