ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparison of two approaches to building a vertical search tool: a case study in the nanotechnology domain
Full text PdfPdf (859 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Novel search environments table of contents
Pages: 135 - 144  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-513-0
Authors
Michael Chau  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Hsinchun Chen  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Jialun Qin  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Yilu Zhou  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Yi Qin  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Wai-Ki Sung  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Daniel McDonald  The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 93,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/544220.544246
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As the Web has been growing exponentially, it has become increasingly difficult to search for desired information. In recent years, many domain-specific (vertical) search tools have been developed to serve the information needs of specific fields. This paper describes two approaches to building a domain-specific search tool. We report our experience in building two different tools in the nanotechnology domain -- (1) a server-side search engine, and (2) a client-side search agent. The designs of the two search systems are presented and discussed, and their strengths and weaknesses are compared. Some future research directions are also discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
Chen, H., Schufels, C., and Orwig, R. Internet Categorization and Search: A Self-Organizing Approach, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 7(1), 88--102 (1996)
 
9
Courteau , J. "Genome Databases," Science, 254, (1991), 201--207
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
Hovy, E. and Lin, C. Y. Automated Text Summarization in SUMMARIST. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, 81--94, MIT Press 1999
 
16
 
17
 
18
Lawrence, S. and Giles, C. L. Accessibility of Information on the Web, Nature, 400 (1999), 107--109
 
19
Lin, C., Chen, H., and Nunamaker, J. Verifying the Proximity and Size Hypothesis for Self-Organizing Maps. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3) (1999-2000), 61--73
20
 
21
Luhn, H. P. The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2 (2), 159--165 (1959)
 
22
 
23
Mauldin, M. L. Lycos: Design Choices in an Internet Search Service. IEEE Expert, 12(1) (1997), 8--11
 
24
McBryan, O. A. GENVL and WWWW: Tools for Taming the Web. In Proceedings of the 1st International World Wide Web Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994
 
25
Pinkerton, B. Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler. In Proceedings of the 2nd International World Wide Web Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 1994
26
 
27
Stix, G. (ed.). Nanotechnology. Scientific America, September 2001 (entire issue)
 
28
29

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Chau: colleagues
Hsinchun Chen: colleagues
Jialun Qin: colleagues
Yilu Zhou: colleagues
Yi Qin: colleagues
Wai-Ki Sung: colleagues
Daniel McDonald: colleagues