Women in computing around the world

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the participation of women in computing in more than 30 countries, by focussing on participation at undergraduate level. A brief discussion covers how societal and cultural factors may affect women's participation. Statistics from many different sources are presented for comparison. Generally, participation is low --- most countries fall in the 10-40% range with a few below 10% and a few above 40%.

REFERENCES

• 1: G. Aikhorin. Personal communication, 2001.
• 2: M. Arteimi. Personal communication, 2002.
• 3: R. Ayfer. Personal communication, 2002.
• 4: M. Barinaga. Surprises across the cultural divide. Science, 263:1468-1472, 11 March 1994.
• 5: N. A. Bhatti. Personal communication, 2001.
• 6: Christina Bjorkman , Ivan Christoff , Fredrik Palm , Anna Vallin, Exploring the pipeline: towards an understanding of the male dominated computing culture and its influence on women, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.30 n.2, p.64-69, June 1998 [doi>10.1145/292422.292445]
• 7: Judy Brown , Peter Andreae , Robert Biddle , Ewan Tempero, Women in introductory computer science: experience at Victoria University of Wellington, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.29 n.1, p.111-115, March 1997
• 8: R. E. Bryant and M. J. Irwin. 1999-2000 CRA Taulbee Survey. Computing Research News, pages 5-11, March 2001. http://www.cra.org/CRN/issues/0102.pdf.
• 9: I. Èerná. Personal communication, 2001.
• 10: K. Chanana. Treading the hallowed halls: Women in higher education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, pages 1012-1022, 18 March 2000.
• 11: M. C. Clarke. Technological experience and technophobia in South African university students. South African Computer Journal, 25:12-17, August 2000.
• 12: B. A. Collis and R. L. Williams. Cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in adolescents' attitudes toward computers and selected school subjects. Journal of Educational Research, 18(1):183-191, 1987.
• 13: A. Craig. Women and Business Computing: where to from here? gates, 4(1):13-19, 1997.
• 14: P. Crawford. Personal communication, 2002.
• 15: Cecile K. M. Crutzen, The Influence of Feminist Theory On Informatics Course Design, Proceedings of the IFIP TC9/WG9.1 Fifth International Conference on Woman, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries - Building New Forms, p.59-73, July 02-05, 1994
• 16: Peter J. Denning , D. E. Comer , David Gries , Michael C. Mulder , Allen Tucker , A. Joe Turner , Paul R. Young, Computing as a discipline, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.1, p.9-23, Jan. 1989 [doi>10.1145/63238.63239]
• 17: Alan Durndell , Z. Haag , D. Asenova , H. Laithwaite, Computer Self Efficacy and Gender, Proceedings of the IFIP TC9/WG9.1 Seventh International Conference on Woman, Work and Computerization: Charting a Course to the Future, p.78-85, June 08-11, 2000
• 18: A. Durndell , K. Thomson, Gender and computing: a decade of change?, Computers & Education, v.28 n.1, p.1-9, Jan. 1997 [doi>10.1016/S0360-1315(96)00032-2]
• 19: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Publications, 2002. http://www.uis.unesco.org/en/pub/pub0.htm.
• 20: Frauenförderung am Departement Informatik, ETH Zürich. Statistik der frauenanteile, 2001. http://www.inf.ethz.ch/frauen/einfuehrung/statistik.html.
• 21: V. C. Galpin. Women in computing around the world: an initial comparison of international statistics. Technical report, School of Computer Science, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, 2002. http://www.cs.wits.ac.za/researcb/pubs.html.
• 22: P. Gasaatura. Personal communication, 2001.
• 23: Padmaja Gogula and Shashi M. Training of women in IT skills: a decade of progress at Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. In A. Adam and J. Owens, editors, Proceedings of the 5th IFIP Conference on Women, Work, and Computerization, Breaking Old Boundaries - Building New Forms, pages 488-500, UMIST, Manchester, July 1994, IFIP.
• 24: A. M. Hoffman-Barthes, S. Nair, and D. Malpede. Scientific, technical and vocational education of girls in Africa: summary of 21 national reports, 1999. UNESCO working document, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001180/118078eo.pdf.
• 25: IEEE-WIE Switzerland. Statistical data of the students who graduate at EPLF in 1998, 2000. http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r8/switzerland/WomenInEngineering/stat.htm.
• 26: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Españia. INEbase: Estadística de enseñanza universitaria, 1999. http://www.ine.es/inebase/cgi/um.
• 27: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática, Mexico. Sistema de Indicadores para el Seguimiento de la Situación de la Mujer en México: Educación, 1999. http://www.inegi.gob.mx.
• 28: Ingeborg Janssen Reinen , Tjeerd Plomp, Information technology and gender equality: a contradiction in terminis?, Computers & Education, v.28 n.2, p.65-78, Feb. 1997 [doi>10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00005-5]
• 29: H. Kruppa and Zs. Lipták. Frauenförderung am Departement Informatik, ETH Zürich. Personal communication (Internet Research conducted in October 2000), 2002.
• 30: Lim Gek Kheng. WIT: the Singaporean way. The Computer Bulletin, 2(1):18-20, 1990.
• 31: Zs. Lipták. Personal communication, 2002.
• 32: Vasilios Makrakis, Cross-Cultural Gender Differences in Student Self-Efficacy: The Impact of Culture, Proceedings of the IFIP 12th World Computer Congress on Education and Society - Information Processing '92 - Volume 2, p.233-238, September 07-12, 1992
• 33: M. C. Monard and M. C. Nicoletti. A perspective of Brazilian women in Computer Science academia. In A. Adam and J. Owens, editors, Proceedings of the 5th IFIP Conference on Women, Work, and Computerization, Breaking Old Boundaries - Building New Forms, pages 91-100, UMIST, Manchester, July 1994. IFIP.
• 34: C. Mueller. Personal communication, 2001.
• 35: C. C. Mukhopadhyay. The cultural context of gendered science: a theoretical model derived from studies in India. gates, 3(1):11-18, 1996.
• 36: National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics 2000, 2001. US Department of Education, Washington, D.C. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/digest.
• 37: National Statistical Office Thailand. Gender Statistics, 2001. http://www.nso.go.th/gender/eedu.htm.
• 38: National Student Selection and Placement Center, Higher Education Statistics 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, Turkey.
• 39: E. Newmarch, S. Taylor-Steele, and A. Cumpston. Women in IT - what are the barriers. In Network of Women in Further Education Conference, March 2000. http://www.deet.gov.au/iae/analysis/womeninit.htm.
• 40: C. Ng Choon Sim and C. Yong. Information technology, gender and employment: a case study of the telecommunications industry of Malaysia. In S. Mitter and S. Rowbotham, editors, Women encounter technology: changing patterns of employment in the Third World. UNU/INTECH, 1995. http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu37we/uu37we00.htm.
• 41: NTNU. Jenter & data, 2002. http://datajenter.ntnu.no/2002/.
• 42: Veronika Oechtering , Roswitha Behnke, Situations and advancement measures in Germany, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.1, p.75-82, Jan. 1995 [doi>10.1145/204865.204881]
• 43: Office of Science and Technology, SET statistics 2001, 2001. http://www.set4women.gov.uk/ost/setstats/index.htm.
• 44: Peer Review Programme. Executive Summary: Reducing the Gender Digital Divide in Skills and Employment, Germany, 2000. http://peerreview.almp.org/en/GERMdec00.htm.
• 45: Republica de Bolivia: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Estadísticas de educación - anuario estadístico - 2000, 2000. http://www.ine.gov.bo.
• 46: C. Ronge. Personal communication, 2001.
• 47: Linda Selby , Ken Ryba , Alison Young, Women in computing: what does the data show?, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.30 n.4, p.62-67, Dec. 1998 [doi>10.1145/306286.306318]
• 48: Y. Shapiro and J. Jacobs. South African Graduate Statistics 1999: Profiles and Recent Trends. HSRC, Pretoria, 1999.
• 49: L. Shashaani and A. Khalili. Gender and computers: similiarities and differences in Iranian college students' attitudes towards computers. Computers and Education, 37:363-375, 2001.
• 50: A. Shode. Personal communication, 2001.
• 51: G. Sigurdardóttir. Women in the Icelandic information society. In Conference about Women and the Information Society. Reykjavík, Iceland, April 2000. http://www.simnet.is/konur/erindi/engish_gudbjorg erindi.htm.
• 52: D. M. Silva. Information technology & women in developing countries: a Brazilian perspective, 2000. Un-published document.
• 53: R. Sinnappan. Personal communication, 2001.
• 54: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. Statistical Yearbook 2001, 2001. http://www.gov.si/zrs/leto01/kazalo01.htm.
• 55: Statistics Norway. Current Education Statistics: Universities and Colleges, Key Figures 2000, 2001. http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/04/utdanning_as_en/200103/au200103.pdf.
• 56: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. Studienanfaengerinnen und absolventinnen im fach informatik, 2001. Wiesbaden, Germany.
• 57: J. Støíbrná. Personal communication, 2001.
• 58: M. Suriya. Personal communication, 2002.
• 59: Swedish Institute. Fact sheets on Sweden: Higher education in Sweden, 2001. http://www.si.se/docs/infosweden/engelska/fs83m.pdf.
• 60: SWIFT. Simon Fraser University Fall 1997 headcount in engineering and science programs, 1998. http://taz.cs.ubc.ca/swift/survey_stats/scigende.html.
• 61: SWIFT. Percentage of male to female undergraduates in Science at UBC, 2000. http://taz.cs.ubc.ca/swift/survey_stats/ubcdepSt.html.
• 62: G. Joy Teague , Val A. Clarke, Attracting women to tertiary computing courses, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.25 n.1, p.208-212, March 1993
• 63: Lorna Uden, Gender Bias: The East-West Paradox, Woman into Computing: Selected Papers 1988-1990, p.386-391, January 1991
• 64: UNESCO. Statistical Yearbook 1998. UNESCO Publishing and Bernan Press, 1998.
• 65: UNESCO. Access of girls and women to scientific, technical and vocational education in Africa, 1999. http://www.chi-naacc.edu.cn/wenyuan/unesco/05/.
• 66: Liisa von Hellens , Sue Nielsen, Australian women in IT0, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.7, p.46-52, July 2001 [doi>10.1145/379300.379310]
• 67: M. Weil and L. D. Rosen. The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: a study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3):95-133, 1995.