Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors

ABSTRACT

This paper recommends methods for increasing female participation in undergraduate computer science. The recommendations are based on recent and on-going research into the gender gap in computer science and related disciplines They are intended to work in tandem with the Computing Research Association's recommendations for graduate programs (see [18] in this issue) to promote a general increase in women's participation in computing professions.Most of the suggestions offered here could improve the educational environment for both male and female students. However, general improvements are likely to be of particular benefit to women because women in our society do not generally receive the same level of support that men receive for entering and persisting in this field. Parents, friends, and classmates seldom encourage women to choose and continue in a computing discipline. Those few women who declare a computing major tend to experience continued lack of support throughout their education. They have few female peers to call on for help. Furthermore, students in their own and other majors may consider them odd. Even faculty can discourage women with unthinking remarks or with expectations based on the assumption that men's behavior and experience are the basis for success in computing majors. This lack of support can block or weaken women's commitment to computing. Moreover, when conditions in a department are generally unfavorable, those with a weakened commitment to the discipline often leave at higher rates than those who have sufficient support to overcome the conditions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Astin, Alexander W. and Helen S. Astin. 1992. Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences Higher Education Research Institute. UCLA. Los Angeles.
• 2: Cohoon, J. McGrath. On-going research for NSF project "ITWF: Departmental Factors in Gendered Attrition from Undergraduate Computing Majors." Grant #EIA-0089959.
• 3: Cohoon, J. McGrath. 2000. "Non-Parallel Processing: Gendered Attrition in Academic Computer Science" Dissertation. University of Virginia.
• 4: J. McGrath Cohoon, Toward improving female retention in the computer science major, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.5, p.108-114, May 2001 [doi>10.1145/374308.374367]
• 5: Etzkowitz, Henry, Carol Kemelgor, Michael Neuschatz, Brian Uzzi. 1994. "Barriers to Women in Academic Science and Engineering." Who will do Science? Educating the Next Generation. Edited by Willie Pearson Jr. and Irwin Fechter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• 6: Houston, Andrea. 2001. Personal communication regarding on-going research.
• 7: Jacobs, Jerry A. 1987. "The Sex Typing of Aspirations and Occupations: Instability During the Careers of Young Women." Social Science Quarterly. 68, 1, 122-137.
• 8: Margolis, Jane and Allan Fisher. 2001. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge. MIT Press.
• 9: Margolis, Jane, Allan Fisher, and Faye Miller. 2000. "The Anatomy of Interest: Women in undergraduate Computer Science." Women's Studies Quarterly. Spring/Summer.
• 10: Margolis, Jane and Allan Fisher. 1997. "Geek Mythology and Attracting Undergraduate Women to Computer Science." Impacting Change Through Collaboration, Proceedings of the Joint National Conference of the Women in Engineering Program Advocates Network and the National Association of Minority Engineering Program Administrators.
• 11: Morgan, Frank B. Degrees and Other Awards Conferred by Title IV Participating, Degree-Granting Institutions, 1997-98. National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department Education. 2001
• 12: Shauman, K. A. and Y. Xie. 1996. "Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints." Demography 33 (4) 455-468.
• 13: Springer, Leonard, Mary Elizabeth Stanne, and Samuel Donovan. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. Vol. 69, p 21-51.
• 14: Strenta, A. Christopher, Rogers Elliott, Russel Adair, Michael Matier, and Jannah Scott. 1994. "Choosing and Leaving Science in Highly Selective Institutions. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 35. No. 5.
• 15: Surette, Brian J. 2001. "Transfer from two-year to four-year college: an analysis of gender differences." Economics of Education Review. Vol. 20, p 151-163.
• 16: Ustad, G. Melvin. 2001. Report on on-going research. ITWF Workforce Research Conference. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Boulder, CO.
• 17: Zeldin, Amy Lapin, and Frank Pajares. 2000. "Against Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers." American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 37, p 215-246.
• 18: Janice Cuny , William Aspray, Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering: results of a workshop organized by the computing research association, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.2, June 2002 [doi>10.1145/543812.543852]
• 19: Allan Fisher , Jane Margolis, Unlocking the clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon experience, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.2, June 2002 [doi>10.1145/543812.543836]