ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of approximate query optimization
Full text PdfPdf (273 KB)
Source Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Madison, Wisconsin
SESSION: Research session 9: query processing and optimization II table of contents
Pages: 282 - 292  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-507-6
Authors
S. Chatterji  University of California, Berkeley, CA
S. S. K. Evani  Sun Microsystems, Bangalore, India
S. Ganguly  Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies
M. D. Yemmanuru  Sun Microsystems, Bangalore, India
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543613.543650
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this work, we study the complexity of the problem of approximate query optimization. We show that, for any δ > 0, the problem of finding a join order sequence whose cost is within a factor 2Θ(log1-δ(K)) of K, where K is the cost of the optimal join order sequence is NP-Hard. The complexity gap remains if the number of edges in the query graph is constrained to be a given function e(n) of the number of vertices n of the query graph, where n(n - 1)/2 - Θ(nτ) ≥ e(n) ≥ n + Θ(nτ) and τ is any constant between 0 and 1. These results show that, unless P=NP, the query optimization problem cannot be approximately solved by an algorithm that runs in polynomial time and has a competitive ratio that is within some polylogarithmic factor of the optimal cost.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Sanjeev Arora. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs and Hardness of Approximation Algorithms. Technical Report TR-476-94. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 1994.
 
5
 
6
 
7
S. Chatterji, S. S. K. Evani, S. Ganguly and M. D. Yemmanuru. On the complexity of approximate query optimization. Lucent Internal Technical Document ITD-02-42549Z, 2002. Lucent Technologies.


Collaborative Colleagues:
S. Chatterji: colleagues
S. S. K. Evani: colleagues
S. Ganguly: colleagues
M. D. Yemmanuru: colleagues