ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Knowledge compilation = query rewriting + view synthesis
Full text PdfPdf (226 KB)
Source Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Madison, Wisconsin
SESSION: Research session 7: queries and views table of contents
Pages: 199 - 208  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-507-6
Authors
Marco Cadoli  Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Via Salaria 113, I-00198 Roma, Italy
Toni Mancini  Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Via Salaria 113, I-00198 Roma, Italy
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543613.543640
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In Knowledge Compilation (KC) an intractable deduction problem KBf is split into two phases: 1) KB is preprocessed, thus obtaining a data structure DKB; 2) the problem is efficiently solved using DKB and f. Our goal is to study KC in the context of relational databases: Both KB and f are represented as databases, and '⊨' is represented as a query Q in second-order logic. DKB is a database, to be synthesized from KB by means of an appropriate view. Q is rewritten, thus obtaining Qr. We show syntactic restrictions on Q implying that a polynomial-size DKB and a first-order Qr exist, which imply that phase 2 can be done in polynomial time. We also present classes of queries (in some sense complementary to the former ones) for which either no polynomial-size DKB or no first-order Qr exist (unless the PH collapses). Compilation to other complexity classes is also addressed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Marco Cadoli , Francesco M. Donini, A survey on knowledge compilation, AI Communications, v.10 n.3-4, p.137-150, Dec. 1997
 
3
M. Cadoli, F. M. Donini, P. Liberatore, and M. Schaerf. Preprocessing of intractable problems. Technical Report DIS 24-97, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma "La Sapienza", November 1997. To appear in Information and Computation.
 
4
 
5
A. K. Chandra and G. Markowsky. On the number of prime implicants. Discrete Mathematics, 24:7-11, 1978.
 
6
A. Darwiche and P. Marquis. A perspective on knowledge compilation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pages 470-475, 2001.
 
7
 
8
R. Fagin. Generalized First-Order Spectra and Polynomial-Time Recognizable Sets. In R. M. Karp, editor, Complexity of Computation, pages 43-74. AMS, 1974.
 
9
G. Gogic, H. A. Kautz, C. Papadimitriou, and B. Selman. The comparative linguistics of knowledge representation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'95), pages 862-869, 1995.
 
10
11
 
12
H. A. Kautz and B. Selman. Forming concepts for fast inference. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'92), pages 786-793, 1992.
 
13
 
14
V. Lifschitz. Computing circumscription. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'85), pages 121-127, 1985.
 
15
 
16
 
17
18
19
 
20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marco Cadoli: colleagues
Toni Mancini: colleagues