| Interactive graphics: a tool for beginning programming students in discovering solutions to novel problems |
| Full text |
Pdf
(567 KB)
|
| Source
|
Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 137 - 141
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-256-X
Also published in ...
|
|
Author
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 8, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A computer-based, problem-solving exercise was developed, using dynamic graphics to assist beginning programming students in devising and testing solutions to novel problems (problems requiring solution methods with which the students were not already familiar). For evaluation, 103 beginning computer science students at Southeast Missouri State University, were each randomly assigned one of three forms of the exercise containing four array-manipulation problems. The control group worked all four problems without the aid of dynamic graphics; whereas, on Problems 3 and 4, the first experimental group was allowed to test possible solutions by observing graphical execution of attempted code, and the second experimental group was allowed to interactively manipulate the elements of the array by means of arrow keys in order to devise a solution, in addition to observing the graphical execution of their code. Six measures of improvement in performance on Problem 4 over Problem 2 were made for each subject. The one-tailed Wilcoxon two-sample test was applied, using significance level .05, to compare mean scores between groups. The second experimental group showed significantly more improvement than the control group as measured by four of the six scores, and the first experimental group showed significantly more improvement than the control group as measured by two of the six scores. Although the second experimental group scored slightly higher than the first on all but one measure, no significant difference was observable between the two experimental groups. On a follow-up quiz, each experimental group scored slightly, but not significantly, higher than the control group. Additionally, it was noted that only students who had made a score of 13 or more on the KSW Computer Science Placement Exam were able to work either of the two problems used for evaluation.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Burke, R. L. (1982). CAI sourcebook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
diSessa, A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledgebased learning. Cognitive Science, 6(I), 37-75.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Heines, J. M. (1984). Screen design struction. Bedford, MA: Digital Press.
|
| |
7
|
Kaufmann, G. (1980). Imaqerv. lanquaqe, and coqnition. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
|
| |
8
|
Konvalina, J., Stephens, L., & Wileman, S. (1985). KSW Computer Science Placement Exam. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.
|
| |
9
|
Poincar~, H. (1908).Science and method (F. Maitland,Trans.). New York: Dover Publ. Inc.
|
| |
10
|
Roblyer, M. D. (1985). Measurinq the impact of computers in instruction: A non-technical review of research for educators. Washington, DC: The Association for Educational Data Systems.
|
| |
11
|
Walker, D. F., & Hess, R. D. (Eds.) (1984). Instructional software: Principles and D ersDectives for desiqn Publishing Company.
|
| |
12
|
Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). How to solve problems- Elements of a theory of problems and problem so!vine. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.
|
|