ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The trouble with for-loop invariants
Full text PdfPdf (330 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 1 - 4  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-256-X
Also published in ...
Author
William J. Collins  Radford Univ., Radford, VA
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/52964.52966
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss some of the problems in constructing and utilizing loop invariants for For-loops. Another kind of assertion, the loop post-invariant, is offered as an alternative to the loop invariant in designing, documenting and proving the correctness of For-loops.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
"Proving Programs Correct," Robert B. Anderson, John Wiley and Sons, 1979.
 
2
"Intermediate Pascal Programming," William J. Collins, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986.
 
3
 
4
 
5