ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A critiquing model of flexible constraint evaluation for a scheduler's workbench
Full text PdfPdf (529 KB)
Source International conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems archive
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems - Volume 1 table of contents
Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States
Pages: 540 - 547  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-271-3
Authors
Michael Prietula  Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Peng Si Ow  Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Brian Huguenard  Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Steve Vicinanza  Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/51909.51971
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Scheduling complex tasks is a difficult and ill-structured problem. Totally automated solutions to certain scheduling problems have certainly been achieved; however, other types of scheduling tasks do not yield easily to traditional solution methods. The latter tasks often involve both quantitative and qualitative constraints as well as changing preferences and subjective judgement. Consequently, it is sometimes impossible to take the human element out of the loop. Faced with similar problems, research in medical artificial intelligence has yielded a model of advising, called critiquing, which can be made to be comprehensible to, and consistent with, the decisionmaker's methods. In this paper we describe a project which incorporates a version of the critiquing model within a hybrid artificial intelligence/analytical-based scheduler's workbench, called MRL.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Kaplan, R. {1972}. Augmented transition networks as psychological models of sentence comprehension. Artifu:ial Intelligence, 3, 77-100.
 
2
Langlotz, C. & Shortliffe, E. {1983}. Adapting a consultation system to critique user plans. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19, 479-496.
 
3
Miller, P. {1983}. AWFENDING: Critiquing a physician;s management plan. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5, 449-461.
 
4
Miller, P. {1983}. Critiquing anesthetic management: The "ATTENDING" computer system. Anesthesiology, 53, 362-369.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Miller, P. & Black, H. {1984}. Medical plan-analysis by computer: Critiquing the pharmacologic management of essential hypertension. Computers and Biomedical Research, 17, 38-54.
 
8
Miller, P., Blumnfrucht, S., & Black, H. {1984}. An expert system which critiques patient workup: Modeling conflicting expertise. Computers and Biomedical Research, 17, 54-69.
 
9
Miller, P. {1985}. Goal-directed critiquing by computer: ventilator management. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
 
10
11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Prietula: colleagues
Peng Si Ow: colleagues
Brian Huguenard: colleagues
Steve Vicinanza: colleagues