Critical power slope: understanding the runtime effects of frequency scaling

ABSTRACT

Energy efficiency is becoming an increasingly important feature for both mobile and high-performance server systems. Most processors designed today include power management features that provide processor operating points which can be used in power management algorithms. However, existing power management algorithms implicitly assume that lower performance points are more energy efficient than higher performance points. Our empirical observations indicate that for many systems, this assumption is not valid.We introduce a new concept called critical power slope to explain and capture the power-performance characteristics of systems with power management features. We evaluate three systems - a clock throttled Pentium laptop, a frequency scaled PowerPC platform, and a voltage scaled system to demonstrate the benefits of our approach. Our evaluation is based on empirical measurements of the first two systems, and publicly available data for the third. Using critical power slope, we explain why on the Pentium-based system, it is energy efficient to run only at the highest frequency, while on the PowerPC-based system, it is energy efficient to run at the lowest frequency point. We confirm our results by measuring the behavior of a web serving benchmark. Furthermore, we extend the critical power slope concept to understand the benefits of voltage scaling when combined with frequency scaling. We show that in some cases, it may be energy efficient not to reduce voltage below a certain point.

REFERENCES

• 1: Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification, 2001. http://www.teleport.com/~acpi/spec.htm.
• 2: Pat Bohrer , Elmootazbellah N. Elnozahy , Tom Keller , Michael Kistler , Charles Lefurgy , Chandler McDowell , Ram Rajamony, The case for power management in web servers, Power aware computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2002
• 3: T. D. Burd , R. W. Brodersen, Energy efficient CMOS microprocessor design, Proceedings of the 28th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'95), p.288, January 04-07, 1995
• 4: Jeffrey S. Chase , Darrell C. Anderson , Prachi N. Thakar , Amin M. Vahdat , Ronald P. Doyle, Managing energy and server resources in hosting centers, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, October 21-24, 2001, Banff, Alberta, Canada
• 5: Keith I. Farkas , Jason Flinn , Godmar Back , Dirk Grunwald , Jennifer M. Anderson, Quantifying the energy consumption of a pocket computer and a Java virtual machine, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, p.252-263, June 18-21, 2000, Santa Clara, California, United States
• 6: Krisztián Flautner , Steve Reinhardt , Trevor Mudge, Automatic performance setting for dynamic voltage scaling, Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.260-271, July 2001, Rome, Italy [doi>10.1145/381677.381702]
• 7: M. Fleischmann. Dynamic Power Management for Crusoe Processors, Jan. 2001. http://www.transmeta.com/.
• 8: Jason Flinn , M. Satyanarayanan, Energy-aware adaptation for mobile applications, Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, p.48-63, December 12-15, 1999, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
• 9: D. Grunwald, P. Levis, K. Farkas, C. Morrey, and M. Neufeld. Policies for dynamic clock scheduling. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Oct. 2000.
• 10: Intel. Mobile Intel Pentium III Processor in BGA2 and MicroPGA2 Packages, 2001. Order Number 283653-002.
• 11: Alvin R. Lebeck , Xiaobo Fan , Heng Zeng , Carla Ellis, Power aware page allocation, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, p.105-116, November 2000, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
• 12: Jacob R. Lorch , Alan Jay Smith, Apple Macintosh's Energy Consumption, IEEE Micro, v.18 n.6, p.54-63, November 1998 [doi>10.1109/40.743684]
• 13: Jacob R. Lorch , Alan Jay Smith, Improving dynamic voltage scaling algorithms with PACE, Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, p.50-61, June 2001, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
• 14: D. Mosberger and T. Jin. httperf: A tool for measuring web server performance. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Internet Server Performance, June 1998.
• 15: D. Mosse, H. Aydin, B. Childers, and R. Melhem. Compiler-assisted dynamic power-aware scheduling for real-time applications. In Proceedings of Workshop on Compiler and OS for Low Power (COLP), Oct. 2000.
• 16: Trevor Mudge, Power: A First-Class Architectural Design Constraint, Computer, v.34 n.4, p.52-58, April 2001 [doi>10.1109/2.917539]
• 17: T. Pering, T. Burd, and R. Brodersen. Dynamic voltage scaling and the design of a low-power microprocessor system. In Power Driven Microarchitecture Workshop, June 1998.
• 18: Padmanabhan Pillai , Kang G. Shin, Real-time dynamic voltage scaling for low-power embedded operating systems, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, October 21-24, 2001, Banff, Alberta, Canada
• 19: Johan Pouwelse , Koen Langendoen , Henk Sips, Dynamic voltage scaling on a low-power microprocessor, Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.251-259, July 2001, Rome, Italy [doi>10.1145/381677.381701]
• 20: M. Weiser, B. Welch, A. Demers, and S. Shenker. Scheduling for reduced CPU energy. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Nov. 1994.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.5 COMPUTER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
      C.5.0 General

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.4 PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS

General Terms:
Design, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
energy aware computing