| Embedded software-based self-testing for SoC design |
| Full text |
Pdf
(325 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 39th annual Design Automation Conference
table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
SESSION: New test methods targeting non-classical faults
table of contents
Pages: 355 - 360
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:0738-100X , 1-58113-461-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
A. Krstic
|
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
|
|
W. C. Lai
|
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
|
|
K. T. Cheng
|
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
|
|
L. Chen
|
University of California, San Diego, CA
|
|
S. Dey
|
University of California, San Diego, CA
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 34, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
At-speed testing of high-speed circuits is becoming increasingly difficult with external testers due to the growing gap between design and tester performance, growing cost of high-performance testers and increasing yield loss caused by inherent tester inaccuracy. Therefore, empowering the chip to test itself seems like a natural solution. Hardware-based self-testing techniques have limitations due to performance and area overhead and problems caused by the application of non-functional patterns.Embedded software-based self-testing has recently become focus of intense research. In this methodology, the programmable cores are used for on-chip test generation, measurement, response analysis and even diagnosis. After the programmable core on a System-on-Chip (SoC) has been self-tested, it can be reused for testing on-chip buses, interfaces and other non-programmable cores. The advantages of this methodology include at-speed testing, low design-for-testability overhead and application of functional patterns in the functional environment. In this paper, we give a survey and outline the roadmap and challenges of this emerging embedded software-based self-testing paradigm.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
L. Chen and S. Dey. Software-Based Self-Testing Methodology for Processor Cores. TCAD, Mar. 2001.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
PCI Special Interest Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA. PCI Local Bus Specification, Revision 2.0, Apr. 1994.
|
| |
8
|
On-Chip Bus Development Working Group. Virtual Component Interface Standard (OCB 2 1.0), Mar. 2000.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
J. Lee and J. H. Patel. Architectural Level Test Generation for Microporcessors. TCAD, 1994.
|
| |
14
|
J. Lee and J. H. Patel. Hierarchical Test Generation Under Architectural Level Functional Constraints. TCAD, Sep. 1996.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
K.-T. Cheng and H.-C. Chen. Classification and Identification of Nonrobustly Untestable Path Delay Faults. TCAD, Aug. 1996.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
M. Gumm. VHDL - Modeling and Synthesis of the DLXS RISC Processor. VLSI Design Course Notes, Univ. of Stuttgart, Germany, Dec. 1995.
|
 |
21
|
Xiaoliang Bai , Sujit Dey , Janusz Rajski, Self-test methodology for at-speed test of crosstalk in chip interconnects, Proceedings of the 37th conference on Design automation, p.619-624, June 05-09, 2000, Los Angeles, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/337292.337597]
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
Michael Cuviello , Sujit Dey , Xiaoliang Bai , Yi Zhao, Fault modeling and simulation for crosstalk in system-on-chip interconnects, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design, p.297-303, November 07-11, 1999, San Jose, California, United States
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
IEEE P1500 Web Site, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1500/.
|
 |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
|