ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tools or users: which is the bigger bottleneck?
Full text PdfPdf (144 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 39th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
PANEL SESSION: Tools or Users: Which is the Bigger Bottleneck? table of contents
Pages: 76 - 77  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:0738-100X , 1-58113-461-4
Authors
Ron Collett  Numetrics Management Systems, Santa Clara, CA
Patrick Groeneveld  Eindhoven University of Technology / Magma
Lavi Lev  Cadence Design Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA
Nancy Nettleton  Sun Microsystems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
Paul Rodman  ReShape, Inc., Mountain View, CA
Lambert van den Hoven  Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Sponsor
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/513918.513939
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As chip design becomes ever more complex, fewer design teams are succeeding. Who's to blame? On one hand, tools are hard to use, buggy, not interoperable, and have missing functionality. On the other hand, there is a wide range of engineering skills within the user population, and tools can be abused within flawed methodologies. This panel will quantify and prioritize the key gaps, including interoperability, that must be addressed on both sides.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ron Collett: colleagues
Patrick Groeneveld: colleagues
Lavi Lev: colleagues
Nancy Nettleton: colleagues
Paul Rodman: colleagues
Lambert van den Hoven: colleagues