ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Topology management for sensor networks: exploiting latency and density
Full text PdfPdf (597 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Lausanne, Switzerland
SESSION: Energy Awareness and Power Control table of contents
Pages: 135 - 145  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-501-7
Authors
Curt Schurgers  UCLA-EE Los Angeles, CA
Vlasios Tsiatsis  UCLA-EE Los Angeles, CA
Saurabh Ganeriwal  UCLA-EE Los Angeles, CA
Mani Srivastava  UCLA-EE Los Angeles, CA
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 98,   Citation Count: 50
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/513800.513817
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In wireless sensor networks, energy efficiency is crucial to achieve satisfactory network lifetime. In order to reduce the energy consumption of a node significantly, its radio needs to be turned off. Yet, some nodes have to participate in multi-hop packet forwarding. We tackle this issue by exploiting two degrees of freedom in topology management: the path setup latency and the network density. First, we propose a new technique called Sparse Topology and Energy Management (STEM), which aggressively puts nodes to sleep. It provides a method to wake up nodes only when they need to forward data, where latency is traded off for energy savings. Second, STEM integrates efficiently with existing approaches that leverage the fact that nearby nodes can be equivalent for traffic forwarding. In this case, an increased network density results in more energy savings. We analyze a hybrid scheme, which takes advantage of both setup latency and network density to increase the nodes' lifetime. Our results show improvements of nearly two orders of magnitude compared to sensor networks without topology management.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, G. Pottie, "Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor network," IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, Vol.7, No.5, pp. 16--27, Oct. 2000.
 
2
L. Clare, G. Pottie, J. Agre, "Self-organizing distributed sensor networks," SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Orlando, FL, pp. 229--237, April 1999.
3
4
5
6
 
7
J.-H. Chang, L. Tassiulas, "Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks," INFOCOM 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel, pp. 22--31,March 2000.
 
8
 
9
 
10
C. Guo, L. Zhong, J. Rabaey, "Low-power distributed MAC for ad hoc sensor radio networks," Globecom'01, San Antonio, TX, Nov 2001.
 
11
Sensoria Corporation, http://www.sensoria.com/.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
"ASH Transceiver Designer's Guide," http://www.rfm.com.

CITED BY  50

Collaborative Colleagues:
Curt Schurgers: colleagues
Vlasios Tsiatsis: colleagues
Saurabh Ganeriwal: colleagues
Mani Srivastava: colleagues