ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Characterizing the interaction between routing and MAC protocols in ad-hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (203 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Lausanne, Switzerland
SESSION: Preformance Evaluation table of contents
Pages: 92 - 103  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-501-7
Authors
Chris Barrett  Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
Achla Marathe  Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
Madhav V. Marathe  Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
Martin Drozda  Institute of Informatics, Bratislava, Slovakia
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/513800.513812
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We empirically study the effect of mobility and interaction between various input parameters on the performance of protocols designed for wireless ad-hoc networks. An important objective is to study the interaction of the routing and MAC layer protocols under different mobility parameters. We use three basic mobility models: grid mobility model, random waypoint model, and exponential correlated random model. The performance of protocols is measured in terms of various quality of service measures including (i) latency, (ii) throughput, (iii) number of packets received and (iv) long term fairness. Three different commonly studied routing protocols are used: AODV, DSR and LAR scheme 1. Similarly three well known MAC protocols are used: MACA, 802.11 and CSMA.Our main contribution is simulation based experiments coupled with emph rigorous statistical analysis to characterize the emph interaction between the above stated parameters. Such methods allow us to analyze complicated experiments with large input space in a systematic manner. From our results, we conclude the following:

  • No single MAC or routing protocol dominated the other protocols in their class. More interestingly, no MAC/routing protocol combination was better than other combinations over all mobility models and response variables.
  • In general, it is not meaningful to speak about a MAC or a routing protocol in isolation. Presence of interaction leads to trade-offs between the amount of control packets generated by each layer. The results raise the possibility of improving the performance of a particular MAC layer protocol by using a cleverly designed routing protocol or vice-versa.
.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Challenges in Reliable Data Transport Over Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley, 1998.
2
 
3
Analyzing the Effect of Routing Protocols on Media Access Control Protocols in Radio Networks, submitted. Report LA-UR-01-6218, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2001.
4
5
 
6
L. Bajaj, M. Takai, R. Ahuja, K. Tang, R. Bagrodia, and M. Gerla. GloMoSim: A Scalable Network Simulation Environment. UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report 990027, May 1999.
 
7
S. Das, C. Perkins, and E. Royer. Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000, pp. 3--12.
 
8
S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer and M. K. Marina. Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. To appear in IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, Feb 2001.
 
9
G. Glass and K. D. Hopkins. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, 3rd ed., Allyn and Bacon, 1996.
10
 
11
D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. Mobile Computing, Tomasz Imielinski and Hank Korth, Eds. Chapter 5, pages 153--181, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
12
 
13
P. Karn. MACA - a new channel access method for packet radio. MACA - a new channel access method for packet radio ARRL/CRRL Amateur Radio 9th Computer Networking Conference 1990.
14
15
16
 
17
A. Nasipuri, J. Zhuang and S. R. Das. A Multichannel CSMA MAC Protocol for Multihop Wireless Networks. Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Sept., 1999.
 
18
19
 
20
 
21
E. Royer, S. Lee and C. Perkins. The Effects of MAC Protocols on Ad hoc Network Communications. Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Chicago, IL, September 2000.
 
22
R. Christensen. Log-linear Models, Springer Verlag, Chapter 4, 1990.
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
M. Zonoozi and P. Dassanayake. User mobility modeling and characterization of mobility patterns. IEEE Trans. on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1239--1252, Sept. 1997.

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chris Barrett: colleagues
Achla Marathe: colleagues
Madhav V. Marathe: colleagues
Martin Drozda: colleagues