ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the characteristics of scholarly annotations
Full text PdfPdf (29 KB)
Source Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia table of contents
College Park, Maryland, USA
SESSION: Links table of contents
Pages: 78 - 79  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-477-0
Authors
Richard Furuta  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Eduardo Urbina  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/513338.513361
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We report on our observations of annotations for use in scholarly communication, rather than for use as personal artifact. Scholarly annotations reflect uses that predate digital representations and benefit from formalized structure. Scholarly annotations may originate from a broader set of sources than personal annotations, and their association with texts may result from inferences rather than from explicit specifications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. M. Casasayas. Ensayo de una guia de bibliografia Cervantina. Tomo V. Mallorca, 1995
 
2
3
 
4
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen and L. Burnard. TEI P4: Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange, 2001. http://www.tei-c.org/P4X
5
6


Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard Furuta: colleagues
Eduardo Urbina: colleagues