| How do interactive texts reflect interactive functions? |
| Full text |
Pdf
(147 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia
archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
table of contents
College Park, Maryland, USA
SESSION: Narratives and Literary Hypertext
table of contents
Pages: 67 - 68
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-477-0
|
|
Author
|
|
Päivö Laine
|
Seinäjoki Polytechnic Business School, Seinäjoki, Finland
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The purpose of strings of text that are embedded in hyperlinks, buttons and other interactive elements on Web pages is to inform the user of the interactive function and its effects. The explicitness of these i-texts, such as link anchors or button labels, depends on their linguistic structure. I-texts that profile a process and contain a verb are more explicit than labels with a nominal profile. Clicking an i-text, an acteme, may have different interactive effects. The explicitness of the i-text seems to correlate with the impact of the interactive function, but the degree of interaction that the target page requires is not reflected clearly in the linguistic form of the i-text.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Engebretsen, Martin (2000). Hypernews and Coherence. In Journal of Digital Information. 1:7 {online}. Available:http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i07/Engebretsen/
|
| |
4
|
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
|