ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Should I stay or should I go?: the role of trust and risk in determining behavior in an IS development team
Full text PdfPdf (221 KB)
Source Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research table of contents
Kristiansand, Norway
SESSION: 4.1 Virtual Work and Teams table of contents
Pages: 124 - 125  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-466-5
Authors
Mark Fuller  Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Mark A. Serva  The University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Sponsor
SIGCPR: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/512360.512389
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This research extends the Mayer, Davis & Schoorman (1995) model of interpersonal trust to examine the evolution of trust between teams. Risk-taking actions by teams were found to predict the evolution of trust over time. Using a controlled setting to reduce the impact of extraneous variables and a cross-source design to collect data, we studied reciprocal trust between managers and developers, specifically examining whether trusting behaviors exhibited by one team influence perceptions of that team's trustworthiness held by an interdependent team. Findings indicate that ability, benevolence and integrity are stable predictors of trust in this interteam context. Further, trust was found to significantly influence teams' risk-taking behaviors. Finally, risk-taking behaviors by one team were found to have a reciprocal effect on perceptions of trustworthiness by the interdependent team.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bennis, W. G., Slater, P. E., The Temporary Society. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
 
2
Bartlett, C. A., Ghoshal, S., Rebuilding Behavioral Context: Turn Process Reengineering into People Rejuvenation. Sloan Management Review, 1995. 37-11-23.
 
3
 
4
Moravec, M., Johannesen, O. J., Hjelmas, T. A., Thumbs up for Self-Managed Teams. Management Review, 1997. 86-42-47.
 
5
"Chaos". The Standish Group, 1995.
 
6
Field, T., When Bad Things Happen to Good Projects. CIO Magazine, 1997.
 
7
Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1990. 54-42-59.
 
8
 
9
Zaheer, A., Venkatraman, N., Relational Governance as an Interorganizational Strategy: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 1995. 16-373-392.
 
10
Argyris, C., Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.
 
11
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., An Integration Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995. 20-709-734.
 
12
Organ, D. W., Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark Fuller: colleagues
Mark A. Serva: colleagues