|
ABSTRACT
The use of a knowledge-based logic for organizing project teams has received increasing attention from information systems scholars. This view contends that successful knowledge integration positively contributes to IS project success, especially when the necessary expertise for a project is distributed among individuals from different functional areas. Proponents of this view argue that knowledge integration is effective because it minimizes the need for learning and maximizes the sharing of individual expertise within the context of a projec.Two recent IS studies have found that sharing individual expertise across traditionally disparate knowledge domains is a critical ingredient of team effectiveness. This on-going study raises the question of whether knowledge integration at the team level also contributes to individual expertise development (as a result of participation in a project).We hypothesize two sets of relationships. First, we hypothesize that knowledge integration curvilinearly influences individual expertise development. Second, we hypothesize that individual expertise development is a more significant predictor of individual team members' satisfaction with team processes (a mediation effect). Individual expertise development is conceptualized as a second-order construct that is composed of two first-order variables, individual learning and professional growth. The former adds directly to domain-specific individual knowledge bases while the latter involves systemic learning.A multi-level model is developed to test these relationships. Data collection methods, using a sample of 142 individuals in 42 zero-history e-business project teams, are described along with scale development and validation procedures.Knowledge integration at the team level has a potential dark side at the individual level. The key contribution of this study is development and testing of a multilevel model linking expertise development at the individual level to knowledge integration at the team level. Clearly, balancing short-term gains in terms of increased project success versus long-term gains in terms of individual expertise development raises some puzzling challenges for e-business project managers. Managers cannot forsake successful execution of e-business software projects at "Internet speed," especially when the future competitiveness of their firm hinges on their success. Nonetheless, inattention to individual's expertise development will contribute to the rapid obsolesce of IT personnel's expertise and potentially trigger their attrition. By testing the relationships between these variables, our findings can guide managers in assembling temporary project teams that might create win-win scenarios for both a project that demands innovative integration of expertise and for the individuals who execute that project.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
M. Alavi, "Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues," MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, pp. 107--136, 2001.
|
| |
3
|
L. Argote, D. Gruenfeld, and C. Naquin, "Group Learning in Organizations," in Groups at Work: Theory and Research, M. Turner, Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001, pp. 369--411.
|
| |
4
|
L. Argote and P. Ingram, "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 82, pp. 150--169, 2000.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
V. Basili and G. Caldiera, "Improve Software Quality by Reusing Knowledge and Experience," Sloan Management Review, pp. 55--64, 1995.
|
| |
8
|
K. Carley, "Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover," Organization Science, vol. 3, pp. 20--46, 1992.
|
| |
9
|
M. De Boer, F. Van den Bosch, and H. Volberda, "Managing Organizational Knowledge Integration in the Emerging Multimedia Complex," Journal of Management Studies, vol. 36, pp. 379--418, 1999.
|
| |
10
|
R. Grant, "Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Envoirnments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, vol. 7, pp. 375--387, 1996.
|
| |
11
|
D. Griesinger, "The Human Side of Economic Organization," Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, pp. 478--499, 1990.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
A. Kristof-Brown and C. Stevens, "Goal Congruence in Project Teams: Does the Fit Between Members' Personal Mastery and Performance Goals Matter?," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 86, pp. 1083--1095, 2001.
|
| |
14
|
W. C. Lawther, "Content Validation: Conceptual and Methodological Issues," Review of Public Personnel Administration, vol. 6, pp. 37--49, 1986.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
J. Lohmoeller, Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
J. Mathieu, "The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 85, pp. 273, 2000.
|
| |
19
|
S. Matusik and C. Hill, "The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage," Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, pp. 680--697, 1998.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
I. Nonaka, "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, vol. 5, pp. 14--37, 1994.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
R. Sternberg and et. al, "Understanding Practical Intelligence: The Role of Tacit Knowledge," in Practical Intelligence on Everyday Life, R. Sternberg and et. al, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 104--143.
|
| |
26
|
G. Szulanski, "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp. 27--43, 1996.
|
| |
27
|
A. Tiwana and E. R. McLean "Towards a Theory of Architectural Knowledge Integration Capability: A Test of an Empirical Model in E-business Project Teams," presented at 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia, 2001.
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
|