ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities
Full text PdfPdf (1.06 MB)
Source International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution table of contents
Orlando, Florida
SESSION: Session 4 (full technical papers): evolution patterns and models table of contents
Pages: 76 - 85  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-545-9
Authors
Kumiyo Nakakoji  SRA Key Technology Laboratory, 3-12 Yotsuya, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-0004, Japan and NAIST, 8916-5, Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0101, Japan and PRESTO, JST
Yasuhiro Yamamoto  NAIST 8916-5, Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0101, Japan and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Yoshiyuki Nishinaka  SRA Key Technology Laboratory, 3-12 Yotsuya, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-0004 Japan
Kouichi Kishida  SRA Key Technology Laboratory, 3-12 Yotsuya, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-0004 Japan
Yunwen Ye  SRA Key Technology Laboratory, 3-12 Yotsuya, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-0004 Japan and University of Colorado at Boulder
Sponsor
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 189,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/512035.512055
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Open-Source Software (OSS) development is regarded as a successful model of encouraging "natural product evolution". To understand how this "natural product evolution" happens, we have conducted a case study of four typical OSS projects. Unlike most previous studies on software evolution that focus on the evolution of the system per se, our study takes a broader perspective: It examines not only the evolution of OSS systems, but also the evolution of the associated OSS communities, as well as the relationship between the two types of evolution.Through the case study, we have found that while collaborative development within a community is the essential characteristic of OSS, different collaboration models exist, and that the difference in collaboration model results in different evolution patterns of OSS systems and communities. To treat such differences systematically, we propose to classify OSS into three types: Exploration-Oriented, Utility-Oriented, and Service-Oriented. Such a classification can provide guidance on the creation and maintenance of sustainable OSS development and communities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
FSF, GNU Coding Standards, at http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards toc.html, accessed on 2/11, 2002
 
6
FSF, GNU Philosophy, at http://www.gnu.org./philosophy/philosophy.html, accessed on 2/11, 2002
 
7
 
8
HackVan, S., Where Did Spencer Kimball and Peter Mattis Go?, at http:/devlinux.com/, accessed on 2/11, 2002
 
9
 
10
Lave, J., and E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
 
11
Maturana, H. R., and F. J. Varela. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambhala Publications, Boston, MA, 1998.
12
 
13
O'Reilly, T., OSI Business Support, at http://www.opensource.org/advocacy/case for business.html, accessed on 2/11, 2002
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Tiemann, M. Future of Cygnus Solutions, in Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, Stone, M. (ed.), O'Reilly, Sebastopol, 1999, 71-89.
18

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kumiyo Nakakoji: colleagues
Yasuhiro Yamamoto: colleagues
Yoshiyuki Nishinaka: colleagues
Kouichi Kishida: colleagues
Yunwen Ye: colleagues