ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The Yin/Yang web: XML syntax and RDF semantics
Full text PdfPdf (163 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
SESSION: Languages & Authoring for the Semnatic Web table of contents
Pages: 443 - 453  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-449-5
Authors
Peter Patel-Schneider  Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
Jérôme Siméon  Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
: WWW'02
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/511446.511504
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

XML is the W3C standard document format for writing and exchanging information on the Web. RDF is the W3C standard model for describing the semantics and reasoning about information on the Web. Unfortunately, RDF and XML---although very close to each other---are based on two different paradigms. We argue that in order to lead the Semantic Web to its full potential, the syntax and the semantics of information needs to work together. To this end, we develop a model-theoretic semantics for the XML XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model, which provides a unified model for both XML and RDF. This unified model can serve as the basis for Web applications that deal with both data and semantics. We illustrate the use of this model on a concrete information integration scenario. Our approach enables each side of the fence to benefit from the other, notably, we show how the RDF world can take advantage of XML query languages, and how the XML world can take advantage of the reasoning capabilities available for RDF.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Amann, I. Fundulaki, and M. Scholl. Integrating ontologies and thesauri for rdf schema creation and metadata querying. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 2000.
2
3
 
4
T. Berners-Lee. Why RDF model is different from the XML model, 1999. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDF-XML.html.
 
5
H. Boley. A web data model unifying XML and RDF, Sept. 2001. Unpublished draft. http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~boley/xmlrdf.html
 
6
T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. Sperberg-McQueen, and E. Maler. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (second edition). W3C recommendation., Oct. 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml
 
7
 
8
D. Chamberlin, D. Florescu, J. Robie, J. Siméon, and M. Stefanescu. Xquery 1.0: An xml query language, June 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/
9
 
10
J. Cowan and R. Tobin. Xml information set. W3C Recommendation, Oct. 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
 
11
Enosys markets. http://www.enosysmarkets.com
 
12
M. Fernández and J. Marsh. The XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 data model. W3C Working Draft., June 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/query-datamodel/
13
 
14
I. Fundulaki, B. Amann, M. Scholl, C. Beeri, and A.-M. Vercoustre. Mapping xml fragments to community web ontologies. In Fourth International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB'2001), Santa Barbara, CA, June 2001.
 
15
Galax xquery 1.0 implementation. http://db.bell-labs.com/galax/
 
16
P. Hayes. RDF model theory. W3C Working Draft, Sept. 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/
 
17
G. Karvounarakis, V. Christophides, D. Plexousakis, and S. Alexaki. Querying rdf descriptions for community web portals. In The French National Database Conference, BDA'2001, Agadir, Maroc, Oct. 2001. http://139.91.183.30:9090/RDF/RQL/
 
18
O. Lassila and R. Swick. Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. W3C Recommentation, Feb. 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/
 
19
X. Leroy. The Objective Caml system, release 3.02, Documentation and user's manual. Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Sept. 2001. http://caml.inria.fr/
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
S. Melnik. Bridging the gap between RDF and XML, Dec. 1999. http://www-db.stanford.edu/~melnik/rdf/fusion.html
 
24
L. Miller. Inkling: Rdf query using squishql. http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/rdfquery/
 
25
Nimble technology. http://www.nimble.com
 
26
Organization for the advancement of structured information
 
27
 
28
J. Robie, L. M. Garshol, S. Newcomb, M. Biezinski, M. Fuchs, L. Miller, D. Brickley, V. Christophides, and G. Karvounarakis. The syntactic Web: Syntax and semantics on the Web. In Extreme Markup Languages'2001, Montreal, Canada, Aug. 2001.
 
29
H. Thompson, D. Beech, M. Maloney, and N. Mendelsohn. XML schema part 1: Structures. W3C Recommentation, May 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/
 
30
F. van Harmelen, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and I. Horrocks. A model-theoretic semantics for DAML+OIL, Mar. 2001. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/model-theoretic-semantics.html
 
31
F. van Harmelen, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and I. Horrocks. Reference description of the DAML+OIL (march 2001) ontology markup language, Mar. 2001. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html

CITED BY  13

Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter Patel-Schneider: colleagues
Jérôme Siméon: colleagues