Paid placement strategies for internet search engines

ABSTRACT

Internet search engines and comparison shopping have recently begun implementing a paid placement strategy, where some content providers are given prominent positioning in return for a placement fee. This bias generates placement revenues but creates a disutility to users, thus reducing user-based revenues. We formulate the search engine design problem as a tradeoff between these two types of revenues. We demonstrate that the optimal placement strategy depends on the relative benefits (to providers) and disutilities (to users) of paid placement. We compute the optimal placement fee, characterize the optimal bias level, and analyze sensitivity of the placement strategy to various factors. In the optimal paid placement strategy, the placement revenues are set below the monopoly level due to its negative impact on advertising revenues. An increase in the search engine's quality of service allows it to improve profits from paid placement, moving it closer to the ideal. However, an increase in the value-per-user motivates the gatekeeper to increase market share by reducing further its reliance on paid placement and fraction of paying providers.

REFERENCES

• 1: M. R. Baye and J. Morgan. Information gatekeepers on the internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. American Economic Review, 91(3): 454--474, June 2001.
• 2: Krishna Bharat , Monika R. Henzinger, Improved algorithms for topic distillation in a hyperlinked environment, Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.104-111, August 24-28, 1998, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/290941.290972]
• 3: H. K. Bhargava and V. Choudhary. Economics of electronic intermediary with aggregation. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001.
• 4: C. J. Corbett and U. S. Karmarkar. Optimal pricing strategies for an information intermediary. Technical report, UCLA Andersen Graduate School of Management, Working Paper # 99-001, 1999. http:// www.anderson.ucla.edu/acadunit/dotm/information/papers/99-001.pdf.
• 5: R. M. Dewan, M. L. Freimer, and J. Zhang. Managing web sites for profitability: Balancing content and advertising. Technical report, University of Rochester, 2001. http://rdewan.ssb.rochester.edu/re.htm.
• 6: Daniel Dreilinger , Adele E. Howe, Experiences with selecting search engines using metasearch, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.15 n.3, p.195-222, July 1997 [doi>10.1145/256163.256164]
• 7: J. Gabszewicz, D. Laussel, and N. Sonnac. Tv-broadcasting competition and advertising. Technical report, 1999. http://www.core.ucl.ac.be/services/psfiles/dp00/dp2000-6.pdf.
• 8: A. Goodman. Why search engines must continue to be referees. www.traffick.com, November 2000.
• 9: Marti A. Hearst, TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.59-66, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223904.223912]
• 10: A. Kruger , C. L. Giles , F. M. Coetzee , E. Glover , G. W. Flake , S. Lawrence , C. Omlin, DEADLINER: building a new niche search engine, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Information and knowledge management, p.272-281, November 06-11, 2000, McLean, Virginia, United States [doi>10.1145/354756.354829]
• 11: Steve Lawrence , C. Lee Giles, Context and Page Analysis for Improved Web Search, IEEE Internet Computing, v.2 n.4, p.38-46, July 1998 [doi>10.1109/4236.707689]
• 12: S. Lawrence and C. L. Giles. Accessibility of information on the web. Nature, 400(6740): 107--109, 1999.
• 13: R. McLuhan. Search for a top ranking. Marketing, page 47, October 2000.
• 14: Amit Singhal , Marcin Kaszkiel, A case study in web search using TREC algorithms, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, p.708-716, May 01-05, 2001, Hong Kong, Hong Kong [doi>10.1145/371920.372186]
• 15: R. Wise and D. Morrison. Beyond the exchange: The future of b2b. Harvard Business Review, 78(6): 86--96, November- December 2000.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.0 General

General Terms:
Economics

Keywords:
bias, information gatekeepers, paid placement, promotion, search engines