ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quantitative evaluation of design tradeoffs in file systems
Full text PdfPdf (600 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 1971 international ACM SIGIR conference on Information storage and retrieval table of contents
College Park, Maryland
SESSION: File organization and evaluation table of contents
Pages: 155 - 162  
Year of Publication: 1971
Authors
C. P. Wang  IBM Research Laboratory, San Jose, California
V. Y. Lum  IBM Research Laboratory, San Jose, California
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
University of Maryland : University of Maryland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/511285.511303
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The design of a file system has never been a simple nor a straightforward task because of its complexity. Heuristics and experience still play a major role in guiding the design process. To organize the entire design process in a more systematic manner, large scale simulation has proved to be an effective technique. The FOREM models developed during the past several years (specifically for the evaluation of file system designs) represent facilities of this type. This paper utilizes the FOREM model as the principal tool and presents a hypothetical design example dealing with many essential issues of the design process. Evaluation of designs of several other actual file systems are also being carried out and will be reported at a later date. Only through quantitative evaluation can each design decision be arrived at correctly and the possible tradeoffs be identified.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BUCHOLZ, W. File organization and addressing. IBM Systems Journal, 2 (June 1963) p. 86-111.
2
 
3
TEICHROEW, D. A review of system design techniques. ISDOS Working Paper 17, University of Michigan, January 1969.
 
4
McCUSKEY, W. A. Toward the automatic design of data organization for large scale information processing systems. Ph. D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University, January 1969.
 
5
NUNAMAKER, JR., J. F. On the design and optimization of information processing systems. Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University, June 1961.
 
6
LANGEFORS, B. Some approaches to the theory of information systems. BIT, 3 (1963) p. 229-254.
 
7
DAY, R. H. On optimal extracting from a multiple file data storage system: An application of integer programming. Journal Op. Res., 13:3 (May-June 1965) p. 482-94.
 
8
SENKO, M. E.; LING, H.; LUM, V. Y.; MEADOW, H. R.; BRYMAN, M. R.; DRAKE, R. J.; MEYER, B. C. File design handbook. Contract Report AF 30602-69-C-0100, November 1969.
 
9
SENKO, M. E.; ABRAHAM, C. T.; GHOSH, S. P.; LUM, V. Y.; OWENS, P. W.; POMPER, I. H.; BAKER, F. T.; SCHENKEN, J. D.; WALKER, T. P. Formatted file organization techniques. Final Report AF 30602-4088, May 1967.
 
10
SENKO, M. E.; LUM, V. Y.; OWENS, P. J. A file organization evaluation model - FOREM. 1968 IFIP Congress Proceedings, p. C19-23.