ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Verification, validation, and accreditation: verification, validation, and accreditation of simulation models
Full text PdfPdf (94 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Orlando, Florida
TUTORIAL SESSION: Introductory tutorials table of contents
Pages: 50 - 59  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:0-7803-6582-8
Author
Robert G. Sargent  Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
INFORMS-CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences-College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
SCS : The Society for Computer Simulation International
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses verification, validation, and accreditation of simulation models. The different approaches to deciding model validity are presented; how model verification and validation relate to the model development process are discussed; various validation techniques are defined; conceptual model validity, model verification, operational validity, and data validity are described; ways to document results are given; a recommended procedure is presented; and accreditation is briefly discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, H. A. and R. G. Sargent. 1974. An investigation into scheduling for an interactive computer system, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 18 (2):125-137.
2
 
3
4
 
5
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1982a. Validation of multivariate response simulation models by using hotelling's two-sample T2 test, Simulation, 39(6):185-192.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1984a. A bibliography on the credibility assessment and validation of simulation and mathematical models, Simuletter, 15(3):15-27.
 
9
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1984b. Validation of simulation models via simultaneous confidence intervals, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science, 4(3):375-406.
 
10
Banks, J., J. S. Carson II, and B. L. Nelson. 1996. Discrete-event system simulation, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
 
11
Banks, J., D. Gerstein, and S. P. Searles. 1988. Modeling processes, validation, and verification of complex simulations: A survey, Methodology and Validation, Simulation Series, Vol. 19, No. 1, The Society for Computer Simulation, 13-18.
 
12
DOD simulations: Improved assessment procedures would increase the credibility of results. 1987. U. S. General Accounting Office, PEMD-88-3.
 
13
Fairley, R. E. 1976. Dynamic testing of simulation software, Proc. of the 1976 Summer Computer Simulation Conf., Washington, D.C., 40-46.
 
14
Gass, S. I. 1983. Decision-aiding models: Validation, assessment, and related issues for policy analysis, Operations Research, 31(4):601-663.
 
15
Gass, S. I. 1984. Documenting a computer-based model, Interfaces, 14(3):84-93.
 
16
Gass, S. I. 1993. Model accreditation: A rationale and process for determining a numerical rating, European Journal of Operational Research, 66(2):250-258.
 
17
Gass, S. I. and L. Joel. 1987. Concepts of model confidence, Computers and Operations Research, 8, 4, pp.341-346.
 
18
Gass, S. I. and B. W. Thompson. 1980. Guidelines for model evaluation: An abridged version of the U.S. general accounting office exposure draft, Operations Research, 28(2):431-479.
 
19
Johnson, R. A. 1994. Miller and Freund's probability and statistics for engineers, 5th edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
 
20
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
Naylor, T. H. and J. M. Finger. 1967. Verification of computer simulation models, Management Science, 14(2):B92-B101.
26
 
27
Rao, M. J. and R. G. Sargent. 1988. An advisory system for operational validity, Artificial Intelligence and Simulation: The Diversity of Applications, ed. T. Hensen, Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, 245-2250.
 
28
 
29
Sargent, R. G. 1981. An assessment procedure and a set of criteria for use in the evaluation of computerized models and computer-based modeling tools, Final Technical Report RADC-TR-80-409.
 
30
Sargent, R. G. 1982. Verification and validation of simulation models, Chapter IX in Progress in Modelling and Simulation, ed. F. E. Cellier, Academic Press, London,159-169.
 
31
Sargent, R. G. 1984. Simulation model validation, Simulation and Model-Based Methodologies: An Integrative View, ed. Oren, et al., Springer-Verlag.
32
33
34
 
35
Sargent, R. G. 1990. Validation of mathematical models, Proc. of Geoval-90: Symposium on Validation of Geosphere Flow and Transport Models, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 571-579.
 
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
40
 
41
Schlesinger, et al. 1979. Terminology for model credibility, Simulation, 32(3):103-104.
 
42
Schruben, L. W. 1980. Establishing the credibility of simulations, Simulation, 34(3):101-105.
 
43
Shannon, R. E. 1975. Systems simulation: The art and the science, Prentice-Hall.
44
45
 
46

CITED BY  17