|
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses verification, validation, and accreditation of simulation models. The different approaches to deciding model validity are presented; how model verification and validation relate to the model development process are discussed; various validation techniques are defined; conceptual model validity, model verification, operational validity, and data validity are described; ways to document results are given; a recommended procedure is presented; and accreditation is briefly discussed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Anderson, H. A. and R. G. Sargent. 1974. An investigation into scheduling for an interactive computer system, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 18 (2):125-137.
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Osman Balci, Verification, validation, and accreditation, Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, p.41-4, December 13-16, 1998, Washington, D.C., United States
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1982a. Validation of multivariate response simulation models by using hotelling's two-sample T2 test, Simulation, 39(6):185-192.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1984a. A bibliography on the credibility assessment and validation of simulation and mathematical models, Simuletter, 15(3):15-27.
|
| |
9
|
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1984b. Validation of simulation models via simultaneous confidence intervals, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science, 4(3):375-406.
|
| |
10
|
Banks, J., J. S. Carson II, and B. L. Nelson. 1996. Discrete-event system simulation, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
|
| |
11
|
Banks, J., D. Gerstein, and S. P. Searles. 1988. Modeling processes, validation, and verification of complex simulations: A survey, Methodology and Validation, Simulation Series, Vol. 19, No. 1, The Society for Computer Simulation, 13-18.
|
| |
12
|
DOD simulations: Improved assessment procedures would increase the credibility of results. 1987. U. S. General Accounting Office, PEMD-88-3.
|
| |
13
|
Fairley, R. E. 1976. Dynamic testing of simulation software, Proc. of the 1976 Summer Computer Simulation Conf., Washington, D.C., 40-46.
|
| |
14
|
Gass, S. I. 1983. Decision-aiding models: Validation, assessment, and related issues for policy analysis, Operations Research, 31(4):601-663.
|
| |
15
|
Gass, S. I. 1984. Documenting a computer-based model, Interfaces, 14(3):84-93.
|
| |
16
|
Gass, S. I. 1993. Model accreditation: A rationale and process for determining a numerical rating, European Journal of Operational Research, 66(2):250-258.
|
| |
17
|
Gass, S. I. and L. Joel. 1987. Concepts of model confidence, Computers and Operations Research, 8, 4, pp.341-346.
|
| |
18
|
Gass, S. I. and B. W. Thompson. 1980. Guidelines for model evaluation: An abridged version of the U.S. general accounting office exposure draft, Operations Research, 28(2):431-479.
|
| |
19
|
Johnson, R. A. 1994. Miller and Freund's probability and statistics for engineers, 5th edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
Naylor, T. H. and J. M. Finger. 1967. Verification of computer simulation models, Management Science, 14(2):B92-B101.
|
 |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
Rao, M. J. and R. G. Sargent. 1988. An advisory system for operational validity, Artificial Intelligence and Simulation: The Diversity of Applications, ed. T. Hensen, Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, 245-2250.
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
Sargent, R. G. 1981. An assessment procedure and a set of criteria for use in the evaluation of computerized models and computer-based modeling tools, Final Technical Report RADC-TR-80-409.
|
| |
30
|
Sargent, R. G. 1982. Verification and validation of simulation models, Chapter IX in Progress in Modelling and Simulation, ed. F. E. Cellier, Academic Press, London,159-169.
|
| |
31
|
Sargent, R. G. 1984. Simulation model validation, Simulation and Model-Based Methodologies: An Integrative View, ed. Oren, et al., Springer-Verlag.
|
 |
32
|
|
 |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
Sargent, R. G. 1990. Validation of mathematical models, Proc. of Geoval-90: Symposium on Validation of Geosphere Flow and Transport Models, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 571-579.
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
|
| |
38
|
|
| |
39
|
|
 |
40
|
|
| |
41
|
Schlesinger, et al. 1979. Terminology for model credibility, Simulation, 32(3):103-104.
|
| |
42
|
Schruben, L. W. 1980. Establishing the credibility of simulations, Simulation, 34(3):101-105.
|
| |
43
|
Shannon, R. E. 1975. Systems simulation: The art and the science, Prentice-Hall.
|
 |
44
|
|
 |
45
|
|
| |
46
|
|
CITED BY 17
|
|
|
|
|
Osman Balci , Richard E. Nance , James D. Arthur , William F. Ormsby, Improving the model development process: expanding our horizons in verification, validation, and accreditation research and practice, Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, December 08-11, 2002, San Diego, California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|