ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Competitive generalized auctions
Full text PdfPdf (257 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
SESSION: Session 2A table of contents
Pages: 72 - 81  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-495-9
Authors
Amos Fiat  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Andrew V. Goldberg  InterTrust Tech. Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Jason D. Hartline  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Anna R. Karlin  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 43
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/509907.509921
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We describe mechanisms for auctions that are simultaneously truthful (alternately known as strategy-proof or incentive compatible) and guarantee high "net" profit. We make use of appropriate variants of competitive analysis of algorithms in designing and analyzing our mechanisms. Thus, we do not require any probabilistic assumptions on bids.We present two new concepts regarding auctions, that of a cancellable auction and that of a generalized auction. We use cancellable auctions in the design of generalized auctions, but they are of independent interest as well. Cancellable auctions have the property that if the revenue collected does not meet certain predetermined criteria, then the auction can be cancelled and the resulting auction is still truthful. The trivial approach (run a truthful auction and cancel if needed) yields an auction that is not necessarily truthfu.Generalized auctions can be used to model many problems previously considered in the literature, as well as numerous new problems. In particular, we give the first truthful profit-maximizing auctions for problems such as conditional financing and multicast.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
E. H. Clarke. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 11:17--33, 1971.
5
 
6
A. V. Goldberg, J. D. Hartline, A. R. Karlin, and A. Wright. Competitive Auctions. In submitted to Games and Economic Behavior., 2002.
 
7
 
8
T. Groves. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica, 41:617--631, 1973.
 
9
J. Hershberger and S. Suri. Vickrey Pricing in network routing: Fast payment computation. In Proc. of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2001.
10
 
11
P. Klemperer. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. In Journal of Economic Surveys, pages 227--286. 13(3), 1999.
 
12
A. Mas-Collel, M. Whinston, and J. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, 1995.
 
13
H. Moulin and S. Shenker. Strategyproof Sharing of Submodular Costs. Economic Theory, to appear.
 
14
N. Nisan. Algorithms for Selfish Agents: Mechanism Design for Distributed Computation. In Proc. STACS 1999, pages 1--15. Springer LNCS 1563, 1999.
15
16
17
 
18
L. S. Shapley. Core of Convex Games. Int. J. of Game Theory, 1:11--26, 1971.
 
19
S. Shenker and V. Vazirani. Private Comm., 2001.
 
20
Combinatorial Auctions: A survey. S. DeVries and R. Vohra. In Unpublished manuscript, 2000.
 
21
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. J. of Finance, 16:8--37, 1961.

CITED BY  43

Collaborative Colleagues:
Amos Fiat: colleagues
Andrew V. Goldberg: colleagues
Jason D. Hartline: colleagues
Anna R. Karlin: colleagues