Lessons from industrial design for software engineering through constraints identification, solution space optimisation and reuse

ABSTRACT

Design is a complex activity that can be analysed from a wide variety of perspectives. This paper attempts to look at the individual problem solving process, taking into account psychological arguments. We characterise some of the phases involved in the design process, namely the constraints identification, the optimisation of solution space and the reuse process. We highlight a three-dimensional framework of how the constraints identification impacts on the solution space which, in turn, determines the range of the components that will be eligible for reuse. We discuss this argument through examples from both inside and outside the software engineering field.

REFERENCES

• 1: Sallis, P., Tate, G. & MacDonell, S. (1995). Software Engineering: Practice, Management, Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Sydney, Australia.
• 2: James D. Herbsleb , Audris Mockus , Thomas A. Finholt , Rebecca E. Grinter, An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, p.81-90, May 12-19, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 3: Eric S. Raymond, The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 2001
• 4: G. M. Weinberg, The psychology of computer programming, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY, 1988
• 5: Pierre N. Robillard , Martin P. Robillard, Types of collaborative work in software engineering, Journal of Systems and Software, v.53 n.3, p.219-224, Sep 15, 2000 [doi>10.1016/S0164-1212(00)00013-3]
• 6: Roger S. Pressman, Software engineering (3rd ed.): a practitioner's approach, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1992
• 7: Doug Bell , Douglas Bell, Software Engineering: A Programming Approach, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2000
• 8: Ian Sommerville, Software engineering (6th ed.), Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2001
• 9: Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1978
• 10: Tekinerdogan, B. (2000). Synthesis-Based Software Architecture Design, PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
• 11: Health & Safety Committee (1998). The use of computers in safety-critical applications. HMSO, UK.
• 12: Nancy G. Leveson, High-Pressure Steam Engines and Computer Software, Computer, v.27 n.10, p.65-73, October 1994 [doi>10.1109/2.318597]
• 13: Holloway, C. M. (1999). From bridges and rockets. Lessons for software systems. Proceedings of the 17th International System Safety Conference, August 1999 (pp. 598-608).
• 14: Ruven Brooks, Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.51 n.2, p.197-211, Aug. 1999 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1977.0306]
• 15: Anneliese von Mayrhauser , A. Marie Vans, Program Comprehension During Software Maintenance and Evolution, Computer, v.28 n.8, p.44-55, August 1995 [doi>10.1109/2.402076]
• 16: Westerman, S. J., Shryane, N. M., Crawshaw, C. M. & Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Engineering cognitive diversity, in F. Redmill & T. Anderson (Eds). Safer Systems. Proceedings of the 5th Safety-critical Systems Symposium, Brighton, UK (pp. 111-120).
• 17: A. Whitefield, Human-computer interaction models and their roles in the design of interactive systems, Cognitive ergonomics: understanding, learning and designing human-computer interaction, Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1990
• 18: Burkhardt, J. M. & Déétienne, F. (1994). La réutilisation en génie logiciel: une définition d'un cadre de recherche en ergonomie cognitive. In proceedings of ERGO IA 94, Biarritz, France (pp. 83-95).
• 19: Cordier, F., Denhière, G., George, C., Crépault, J., Hoc, J.-M., Richard, J.-F. (1990). Connaissances et représentations. in J.-F. Richard, C. Bonnet & R. Ghiglione: Traitéé de psychologie cognitive 2. Bordas, Paris (pp. 35-102).
• 20: Allen Newell, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1972
• 21: John A. McDermid, Software Engineer's Reference Book, Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA, 1991
• 22: Thomas Gilb, The Ten Most Powerful Principles for Quality in (Software and) Software Organizations for Dependable Systems, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, p.1-13, October 24-27, 2000
• 23: Reason, J. (1995). Managing the risks of organisational accidents. Aldershot, Ashgate.
• 24: Jackson, M. (2001). Problem frames. Addison Welsey, London, UK.
• 25: Amalberti, R. (1996). La conduite de systèmes à risques. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
• 26: Schanteau, J. (1992). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychologica, 51, 75-86.
• 27: Denis Besnard, Expert Error: The Case of Trouble-Shooting in Electronics, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, p.74-85, October 24-27, 2000
• 28: Bonnardel, N. & Summer, T. (1996). Supporting evaluation in design. Acta Psychologica, 91, 221-244.
• 29: Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• 30: Reason, J. (1987). A preliminary classification of mistakes, in J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan & J. Leplat. (eds). New technology and human error. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
• 31: Lucey, T. (1992). Quantitative techniques. DP Publications, UK.
• 32: Cooke, S. & Slack, N. (1991). Making management decisions. Prentice-Hall,UK.
• 33: Ackoff, R. L. (1962). Scientific method: Optimizing applied research decisions. Wiley.
• 34: Randell, B. (2000). Facing up to faults. The Computer Journal, 43, 95-106.
• 35: Barry Boehm , Alexander Egyed , Julie Kwan , Dan Port , Archita Shah , Ray Madachy, Using the WinWin Spiral Model: A Case Study, Computer, v.31 n.7, p.33-44, July 1998 [doi>10.1109/2.689675]
• 36: Debbie Richards, The reuse of knowledge: a user-centred approach, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.52 n.3, p.553-579, March 2000 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1999.0342]
• 37: Carma McClure, The three Rs of software automation: re-engineering, repository, reusability, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1992
• 38: Buratto, F. & Chabaud, C. (1994). Etude exploratoire du processus de rééutilisation de données chez un concepteur d'achitecture informatique débutant. In proceedings of ERGO IA 94, Biarritz, France (pp. 69-82).
• 39: Lions, J. L. (1996). Ariane 5 Flight 501 failure. Report by the enquiry board. http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~demmel/ma221/ariane5rep.html
• 40: Catrambone, R. & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
• 41: Novick, L. R. & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 338-415.
• 42: Gick, M. L. & McGarry, J. (1992). Learning from mistakes: inducing analoguous solution failures to a source problem produces later successes in analogical transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 623-639.
• 43: Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
• 44: Clark, G. M. & Eyre, J. (2001). The Gateshead Millennium bridge. The Structural Engineer, 79, 30-35.
• 45: Tracy Kidder, The Soul of a New Machine, Little, Brown & Co. Inc., Boston, MA, 1981
• 46: John M. Carroll, Human-computer interaction: psychology as a science of design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.46 n.4, p.501-522, April 1997 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1996.0101]
• 47: James Hollan , Edwin Hutchins , David Kirsh, Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.7 n.2, p.174-196, June 2000 [doi>10.1145/353485.353487]
• 48: J.C. C. Laprie , A. Avizienis , H. Kopetz, Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1992
• 49: Peter G. Neumann, Computer related risks, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1995

INDEX TERMS

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
cognitive psychology, design faults, human-error, industrial design, software engineering