ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A hypothesis driven approach to condition specific transcription factor binding site characterization in S.c.
Full text PdfPdf (671 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Bioinformatics table of contents
Pages: 151 - 158  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-445-2
Authors
Rhonda Harrison  Boston University, Boston, MA and Whitehead Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Charles DeLisi  Boston University, Boston, MA
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/508791.508823
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate a computational process by which transcription factor binding sites can be elucidated using genome-wide expression and binding profiles. The profiles direct us to the intergenic locations likely to contain the promoter regions for a given factor. These sequences are multiply and locally aligned to give an anchor motif from which further characterization can take place. We present bases for and assumptions about the variability within these motifs which give rise to potentially more accurate motifs, capture complex binding sites built upon the basis motif, and eliminate the constraints of the currently employed promoter searching protocols. We also present a measure of motif quality based on the occurrence of the putative motifs in regions observed to contain the binding sites. The assumptions, motif generation, quality assessment and comparison allow the user as much control as their a priori knowledge allows.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
DeRisi, J. L., Iyer, V. R., Brown, P. O., Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997; 278 (5338):680-6
 
3
Hughes J. D., Estep P. W., Tavazoie S., Church G. M. Computational identification of cis-regulatory elements associated with groups of functionally related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Molecular Biology 2000; 296(5):1205-14
 
4
Frech, K., Danescu-Mayer, J.., Werner T., A novel method to develop highly specific models for regulatory units detects a new LTR in GenBank which contains a functional promoter. Journal of Molecular Biology 1997; 270(5):674-687
 
5
Klingenhoff A., Frech K., Quandt K., Werner T., Functional promoter modules can be detected by formal models independent of overall nucleotide sequence similarity. Bioinformatics 1999; 15 (3):180-6
 
6
Lawrence, CE, Altschul SF, Boguski, MS, Liu JS, Neuwald, AF, Wootton, JC, Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science 1993. 262(5131):208-14
 
7
Liu X., Brutlag D. L., Liu J. S., BioProspector: discovering conserved DNA motifs in upstream regulatory regions of co-expressed genes. In Proceedings of Pacific Symposium on Bicomputing 2001;127-38
 
8
Marmolstein, R., Carey, M., Ptashne, M., Harrison, S., DNA Recognition by Gal4: structure of a protein-DNA complex. Nature, 1992; 356:408-414
 
9
Pesole G., Liuni S., D'Souza M., PatSearch: a pattern matcher software that finds functional elements in nucleotide and protein sequences and assesses their statistical significance. Bioinformatics 2000; 16(5):439-50
 
10
Prestridge, D. S. SIGNAL SCAN: A computer program that scans DNA sequences for eukaryotic transcriptional elements. CABIOS 1991; 7, 203-206
 
11
Prestidge, D. S. Predicting Pol II Promoter Sequences Using Transcirption Factor Binding Sites. Journal of Molecular Biology 1995; 249:923-32.
 
12
Ren, B, Robert, F., Wyrick, J., Aparicio, O., Jennings, E. G., Simon, I., Zeitlinger, J., Shreiber, J., Hannett, N., Kanin, E., Volkert, T., Wilson, C., Bell, S. and Young, R. A., . Genome-wide Location and Function of DNA-binding Proteins. Science 2000; 290:2306-2309
 
13
Rippe R. A., Brenner D. A., Tugores A., Techniques to measure nucleic acid-protein binding and specificity. Nuclear extract preparations, DNase I, footprinting, and mobility shift assays. Methodson Molecular Biology 2001; 160:459-79
 
14
Roth, F. R., Hughes, J. D., Estep, P. E. & G. M. Church, Finding DNA Regulatory Motifs within Unaligned Non-Coding Sequences Clustered by Whole-Genome mRNA Quantitation. Nature Biotechnology 1998; 16(10):939-45
 
15
Schug J., Overton, G. C., TESS: Transcription Element Search Software on the WWW in Technical Report CBIL-TR-1997-1001-v0.0, of the Computational Biology and Informatics Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1997
 
16
Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. ,CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. ; Nucleic Acids Research 1994; 22:4673-4680
 
17
Waibel, A. H., Hanazawa, T., Hinton, G. E., Shikano, K.,Lang, K. J., . Pheneme Recognition Using Time-Delay Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing 1989; 37 (3):328-339
 
18
Wingender E., Chen X., Fricke E., Geffers R., Hehl R., Liebich I., Krull M., Matys V., Michael H., Ohnhauser R., Pruss M., Schacherer F., Thiele S., Urbach S., The TRANSFAC system on gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(1):281-3
 
19
Zhu J., Zhang M. Q., SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics 1999; 15(7-8):607-11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rhonda Harrison: colleagues
Charles DeLisi: colleagues