ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selecting among replicated batching video-on-demand servers
Full text PdfPdf (254 KB)
Source International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video archive
Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video table of contents
Miami, Florida, USA
SESSION: Video Streaming 1 table of contents
Pages: 155 - 163  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-512-2
Authors
Meng Guo  College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Mostafa H. Ammar  College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Ellen F. Zegura  College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/507670.507692
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A Video-on-Demand (VoD) service offers a large selection of videos from which customers can choose. Designers of VoD systems strive to achieve low access latency for customers. One approach that has been investigated by several researchers allows the server to batch clients requesting the same video and to serve clients in the same batch with one multicast video stream. This approach has the advantage that it can save server resources as well as server access and network bandwidth, thus allowing the server to handle a large number of customers without sacrificing access latency. VoD server replication is another approach that can allow a VoD service to handle a large number of clients, albeit at the additional cost of providing more servers. While replication is an effective way to increase the service capacity, it needs to be coupled with appropriate selection techniques in order to make efficient use of the increased capacity. In this paper, we investigate the design of server selection techniques for a system of replicated batching VoD servers. We design and evaluate a range of selection algorithms as they would be applied to three batching approaches: Batching with Persistent Channel Allocation, Patching, and Hierarchical Multicast Stream Merging (HMSM). We demonstrate that server replication combined with appropriate server selection scheme can indeed be used to increase the capacity of the service leading to improved performance.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
K. Almeroth and M.Ammar. On the Use of Multicast Delivery to Provide a Scalable and Interactive Video-on-Demand Service. In Journal on Selected Areas of Communication, August 1996.
 
3
K. Calvert, M. Doar, and E. Zegura. Modeling Internet topology. IEEE Communications Magazine, June 1997.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
H.D. Dykeman, M.H. Ammar, J.W. Wong. Scheduling algorithms for Videotex systems under Broadcast Delivery. In Proceedings of ICC'86.
 
8
9
 
10
 
11
Z. Fei, S. Bhattacharjee, E. W. Zegura, and M. H. Ammar. A novel server selection technique for improving the response time of a replicated service. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 1998.
 
12
 
13
Z. Fei, M. Ammar, E. Zegura. Efficient Server Replication and Client Re-Direction for Multicast Services. In Proceedings of SPIE/ITCOM Conference on Scalability and Traffic Control in IP Networks, August 2001.
 
14
Z. Fei, M. Ammar, E. Zegura. Multicast Server Selection: Problems, Complexity and Solutions. To appear in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication.
 
15
 
16
L. Gao, D. Towsley. Threshold-Based Multicast for Continuous Media Delivery In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Dec. 2001
17
18
19
 
20
J. Veizades, E. Guttman, C. Perkins, and S. Kaplan. Service location protocol. RFC 2165, June 1997.
 
21
 
22


Collaborative Colleagues:
Meng Guo: colleagues
Mostafa H. Ammar: colleagues
Ellen F. Zegura: colleagues