ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The effect of first-hop wireless bandwidth allocation on end-to-end network performance
Full text PdfPdf (399 KB)
Source International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video archive
Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video table of contents
Miami, Florida, USA
SESSION: Mobile and Wireless System table of contents
Pages: 85 - 93  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-512-2
Authors
Lili Qiu  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Paramvir Bahl  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Atul Adya  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/507670.507683
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

With the increasing popularity of handheld devices and wireless local area networks (LANs), real-time applications such as Internet telephony are poised to become ubiquitous. While there has been a substantial amount of research on quality of service problems in the Internet, most end-to-end bandwidth allocation approaches, such as RSVP, have had limited success due to scalability and deployment issues. Starting with the observation that reserving bandwidth in the Internet backbone requires substantial infrastructure support, but reserving bandwidth in the first hop does not, we only focus on the first-hop reservation. We evaluate several first hop allocation schemes and determine their effectiveness in improving end-to-end performance. Since utilization of the reserved first-hop bandwidth depends on the remaining Internet path throughput, we characterize this throughput using traces collected from a popular Web site. Our analysis shows that different clients experience widely different throughputs, and that a significant portion of the clients receive very low throughput (e.g. less than 20 Kbps). We then evaluate several bandwidth allocation schemes for various congestion scenarios. Our results show that the scheme which takes into account of both the application data rate and available Internet path bandwidth yields the best performance. Moreover, the scheme performs even better if it adapts to the changing path properties. We discuss how path bandwidth can be measured without active probing, how frequently it needs to be measured, and how this measurement is incorporated into the first-hop bandwidth allocation algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
M. Barry, A. T. Campbell, and A. Veres. Distributed Control Algorithms for Service Differentiation in Wireless Packet Networks. In In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, April 2001.
5
 
6
 
7
J. Davidson, J. Peters, B. Gracely, and J. Peters. Voice over IP Fundamentals. Cisco Press, 2000.
 
8
B. Douskalis. Prentice Hall, 1999.
 
9
S. Floyd. Comments on Measurement-based Admissions Control for Controlled-Load Services. submitted to Computer Communications Review, July 1996.
10
 
11
R. J. Gibbens, F. P. Kelly, and P. B. Key. A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Call Admission Control in ATM Networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communication, pages 1101--1114, August 1995.
 
12
E. Heitfield and A. Levy. Parametric, Semi-parametric and Non-Parametric Models of Telecommunications Demand: An Investigation of Residential Calling Patterns. In Information Economics and Policy, 2001.
13
 
14
15
 
16
NS-2 - Network Simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
 
17
L. M. S. C. of the IEEE Computer Society. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE Standard 802.11, 1999 Edition, 1999.
18
 
19
R. Yavatkar, D. Hoffman, Y. Bernet, F. Baker, and M. Speer. SBM (Subnet Bandwidth Manager): A Protocol for RSVP-based Admission Control over IEEE 802-style networks. RFC 2814, May 2000.
 
20
L. Zhang, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker, and D. Zappala. RSVP: A New Resource ReSerVation Protocol. In IEEE Network Magazine, September 1993.
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lili Qiu: colleagues
Paramvir Bahl: colleagues
Atul Adya: colleagues