|
ABSTRACT
With the increasing popularity of handheld devices and wireless local area networks (LANs), real-time applications such as Internet telephony are poised to become ubiquitous. While there has been a substantial amount of research on quality of service problems in the Internet, most end-to-end bandwidth allocation approaches, such as RSVP, have had limited success due to scalability and deployment issues. Starting with the observation that reserving bandwidth in the Internet backbone requires substantial infrastructure support, but reserving bandwidth in the first hop does not, we only focus on the first-hop reservation. We evaluate several first hop allocation schemes and determine their effectiveness in improving end-to-end performance. Since utilization of the reserved first-hop bandwidth depends on the remaining Internet path throughput, we characterize this throughput using traces collected from a popular Web site. Our analysis shows that different clients experience widely different throughputs, and that a significant portion of the clients receive very low throughput (e.g. less than 20 Kbps). We then evaluate several bandwidth allocation schemes for various congestion scenarios. Our results show that the scheme which takes into account of both the application data rate and available Internet path bandwidth yields the best performance. Moreover, the scheme performs even better if it adapts to the changing path properties. We discuss how path bandwidth can be measured without active probing, how frequently it needs to be measured, and how this measurement is incorporated into the first-hop bandwidth allocation algorithm.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Hari Balakrishnan , Mark Stemm , Srinivasan Seshan , Randy H. Katz, Analyzing stability in wide-area network performance, Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, p.2-12, June 15-18, 1997, Seattle, Washington, United States
|
| |
4
|
M. Barry, A. T. Campbell, and A. Veres. Distributed Control Algorithms for Service Differentiation in Wireless Packet Networks. In In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, April 2001.
|
 |
5
|
Lee Breslau , Edward W. Knightly , Scott Shenker , Ion Stoica , Hui Zhang, Endpoint admission control: architectural issues and performance, Proceedings of the conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, p.57-69, August 28-September 01, 2000, Stockholm, Sweden
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
J. Davidson, J. Peters, B. Gracely, and J. Peters. Voice over IP Fundamentals. Cisco Press, 2000.
|
| |
8
|
B. Douskalis. Prentice Hall, 1999.
|
| |
9
|
S. Floyd. Comments on Measurement-based Admissions Control for Controlled-Load Services. submitted to Computer Communications Review, July 1996.
|
 |
10
|
Sally Floyd , Mark Handley , Jitendra Padhye , Jörg Widmer, Equation-based congestion control for unicast applications, Proceedings of the conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, p.43-56, August 28-September 01, 2000, Stockholm, Sweden
|
| |
11
|
R. J. Gibbens, F. P. Kelly, and P. B. Key. A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Call Admission Control in ATM Networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communication, pages 1101--1114, August 1995.
|
| |
12
|
E. Heitfield and A. Levy. Parametric, Semi-parametric and Non-Parametric Models of Telecommunications Demand: An Investigation of Residential Calling Patterns. In Information Economics and Policy, 2001.
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
Thyagarajan Nandagopal , Tae-Eun Kim , Xia Gao , Vaduvur Bharghavan, Achieving MAC layer fairness in wireless packet networks, Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.87-98, August 06-11, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
[doi> 10.1145/345910.345925]
|
| |
16
|
NS-2 - Network Simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
|
| |
17
|
L. M. S. C. of the IEEE Computer Society. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE Standard 802.11, 1999 Edition, 1999.
|
 |
18
|
Nitin H. Vaidya , Paramvir Bahl , Seema Gupta, Distributed fair scheduling in a wireless LAN, Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.167-178, August 06-11, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
[doi> 10.1145/345910.345939]
|
| |
19
|
R. Yavatkar, D. Hoffman, Y. Bernet, F. Baker, and M. Speer. SBM (Subnet Bandwidth Manager): A Protocol for RSVP-based Admission Control over IEEE 802-style networks. RFC 2814, May 2000.
|
| |
20
|
L. Zhang, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker, and D. Zappala. RSVP: A New Resource ReSerVation Protocol. In IEEE Network Magazine, September 1993.
|
 |
21
|
|
|