ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Interactive mining and knowledge reuse for the closed-itemset incremental-mining problem
Full text PdfPdf (795 KB)
Source ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 2  (January 2002) table of contents
COLUMN: Contributed articles on online, interactive, and anytime data mining table of contents
Pages: 28 - 36  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:1931-0145
Author
Luminita Dumitriu  "Dunarea de Jos" University, str. Domneasca nr. 47, Galati 6200, Romania
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/507515.507520
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Using concept lattices as a theoretical background for finding association rules [11] has led to designing algorithms like Charm [10], Close [7] or Closet [8]. While they are considered as extremely appropriate when finding concepts for association rules, due to the smaller amount of results, they do not cover a certain area of significant results, namely the pseudo-intents that form the base for global implications. We have proposed an approach that, besides finding all proper partial implications, also finds the pseudo-intents. The way our algorithm is devised, it allows certain important operations on concept lattices, like adding or extracting items, meaning we can reuse previously found results. It is a well-known fact that mining association rules may lead to a large amount of results. Since, the mining results are meant to be understood by the user, we have come to the conclusion that he will benefit more from starting small, with some of the items in the data base, understand a small amount of results, and then add items receiving only the extra-results. This way the number of human interventions during the "full" mining process is increased and the process becomes user-driven.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Ganter B.: Algoritmen zur formalen begriffsanalyse, Beitrage zur Beigriffanalyse (Ganter, Wille, Wolf, eds), Wissenschaft-Verlag (1987).
 
5
Godin, R., Missaoui, R., Alaoui, H.: Incremental concept formation algorithms based on Galois (concept) lattices. Computational Intelligence, 11(2):246-267 (1995).
 
6
Gupta, S. K., Bhatnagar, V., Wasan, S. K., Somayajulu, D., Intension Mining: A New Paradigm in Knowledge Discovery. Technical Report No. IITD/CSE/TR2000/001, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, INDIA, (2000)
 
7
 
8
Pei, J., Han, J., Mao, R.: CLOSET: An efficient algorithm for mining frequent closed itemsets. In Proc. of DMKD 2000, pp. 11-20 (2000).
 
9
Wille, R.: Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, Ordered Sets, pp. 445-470, (1982).
 
10
Zaki, M. J., Hsiao, C. J.: CHARM: An Efficient Algorithm for Closed Association Rule Mining, RPI Technical Report 99-10 (1999).
 
11
Zaki, M. J., Ogihara, M.: Theoretical Foundations of Association Rules, in Proc. of the 3rd SIGMOD'98 Workshop on Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (DMKD), Seattle, WA, pp 7:1-7:8 (1998).