ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing attentive interfaces
Full text PdfPdf (640 KB)
Source Eye Tracking Research & Application archive
Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
SESSION: Principles & methodology table of contents
Pages: 23 - 30  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-467-3
Author
Roel Vertegaal  Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/507072.507077
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a tentative framework for the classification of Attentive Interfaces, a new category of user interfaces. An Attentive Interface is a user interface that dynamically prioritizes the information it presents to its users, such that information processing resources of both user and system are optimally distributed across a set of tasks. The interface does this on the basis of knowledge --- consisting of a combination of measures and models --- of the past, present and future state of the user's attention, given the availability of system resources. We will show how the Attentive Interface provides a natural extension to the windowing paradigm found in Graphical User Interfaces. Our taxonomy of Attentive Interfaces allows us to identify classes of user interfaces that would benefit most from the ability to sense, model and optimize the user's attentive state. In particular, we show how systems that influence user workflow in concurrent task situations, such as those involved with management of multiparty communication, may benefit from such facilities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Broadbent, D. E. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press, 1958.
 
3
Carter, P. and Mies van der Rohe, L. Mies Van Der Rohe at Work. Phaidon Press, 1999.
 
4
Deutsch, J. A. and Deutsch, D. Attention: Some Theoretical Considerations. Psychological Review 70, 1963, pp. 80-90.
 
5
Duchowski, A. T. and McCormick, B. H. Gaze-Contingent Video Resolution Degradation. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III. San Jose, CA USA: SPIE, 1998.
 
6
Duncan, S. Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 23, 1972.
 
7
Goldhaber, M. The Attention Economy and the Net. First Monday http://www.firstmonday.dk, 1997.
 
8
H. Helmholtz, von. Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics. Southall, J. P. C. (Ed.). New York: Dover Publications, 1962.
 
9
Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., and Hovel, D. Attention-Sensitive Alerting. In Proceedings of UAI '99, Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, 1999, pp. 305-313.
 
10
James, W. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt, 1890.
 
11
LC Technologies, Inc. The Eyegaze Communication System. Fairfax, VA: http://www.eyegaze.com, 1997.
 
12
Murphy, H. and Duchowski, A. Gaze-Contingent Level of Detail Rendering. In EuroGraphics 2001. Manchester, UK, 2001.
 
13
Norman, D. Towards a Theory of Memory and Attention. Psychological Review 88, 1968, pp. 1-15.
 
14
Posner, M. I. Orienting of Attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, 1980, pp. 3-25.
15
 
16
Smith, D., Irby, C., Kimball, R., Verplank, B., and Harslem, E. Designing the Star User Interface. Byte 7(4), 1982, pp. 242-282.
 
17
Treismann, A. and Gelade, G. A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 1980, pp. 97-136.
 
18
19
 
20
21
22
23
24
 
25
Vertegaal, R., Van der Veer, G. C., and Vons, H. Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000. Montreal, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2000, pp. 95-102.
26
27
 
28
Zhang, J. and Norman, D. Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks. Cognitive Science 18, 1994, pp. 87-122.