ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development
Full text PdfPdf (1.84 MB)
Source ACM SIGMIS Database archive
Volume 32 ,  Issue 1  (Winter 2001) table of contents
SECTION: Research contributions table of contents
Pages: 38 - 56  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:0095-0033
Authors
Suprateek Sarker  Washington State University
Francis Lau  University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Sundeep Sahay  University of Oslo, Norway
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 207,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/506740.506745
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper outlines how the grounded theory methodology was adapted to develop a process model of collaboration in virtual teams. The data analysis was conducted using an adapted version of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding procedures offered by Strauss and Corbin (1990). In applying the grounded theory procedures, the objective was to stay true to the goals and spirit of each coding procedure, while modifying details of procedural steps that were too mechanistic or impractical. The paper develops a meta-theoretical framework through a synthesis of the data, the symbolic interactionist perspective, and structuration theory. This framework is an alternative to the "paradigm model" during selective coding of data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ackroyd, S., and Hughes, J. A. (1992). Data Collection in Context, New York: Longman.
 
2
Agar, M. (1986). Speaking of Ethnography, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
 
3
Charmaz, K. (2000) "Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods," in Handbook of Qualitative Research, --- 2nd edition, N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 509-535.
 
4
 
5
Couch, C. J. (1992). "Toward a Formal Theory of Social Processes," Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 117-134.
 
6
Couch, C. J. (1989). Social Processes and Relationships, Dix Hills: General Hall.
 
7
Couch, C. J. (1986). "Elementary Forms of Social Activity," Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Supplement 2: The Iowa School (Part A), pp. 113-129.
 
8
Flick, U. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
 
9
Gahan, C., and Hannibal, M. (1998). Doing Qualitative Research Using QSR NUD*IST, London: Sage.
 
10
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence versus Forcing, San Francisco, CA: Sociology Press.
 
11
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, San Francisco, CA: Sociology Press.
 
12
Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitiative Research, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
 
13
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
 
14
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
 
15
Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method, New York, NY: Basic Books.
 
16
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., and Leidner, D. E. (1998) "Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 29-64.
 
17
 
18
Lee, A. S. (1991). "Integrating Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 342-365.
 
19
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). "CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 309-340.
 
20
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No., 3, pp. 398-427.
 
21
Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. (1991). "Information Technology and Structuring of Organizations," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 143-168.
 
22
Richards, T. J., and Richards, L. (1994). "Using Computers in Qualitative Research," in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 445-462.
 
23
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1994). "Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview," in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 273-285.
 
24
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research, Newbury Park: Sage.
 
25
Schweizer, T. (1998). "Epistemology: The Nature and Validation of Anthropological Knowledge," in Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, H. R. Bernard (ed.), Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, pp. 39-87.
 
26
Townsend, A. M, DeMarie, S. M., and Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). "Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future," Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 17-29.
 
27
 
28
 
29
Walsham, G. (1995). "Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 74-81.
 
30
Warekentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., and Hightower, R. (1997). "Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-Based Conference System," Decision Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 29-64.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Suprateek Sarker: colleagues
Francis Lau: colleagues
Sundeep Sahay: colleagues