A stage maturity model for enterprise resource planning systems use

ABSTRACT

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems dominate the information technology landscape of many companies. Organizations are at different stages in the implementation process ranging from the initial analysis of implementation options, through completed standard implementations and to the sophisticated exploitation of ERP systems using advanced knowledge management, customer relationship management and supply chain management systems. The authors present a maturity model for ERP systems that identifies three stages and this is illustrated using case data selected from the study which is based on 24 organizations in the US and Europe. In Stage 1, organizations are managing legacy systems and starting the ERP project. In Stage 2, implementation is complete and the functionality of the ERP system is being exploited across the organization. In Stage 3, organizations have normalised the ERP system into the organization and are engaged in the process of obtaining strategic value from the system by using additional systems such as customer relationship management, knowledge management and supply chain planning. It is shown that the organizations follow an S-shaped curve, and that most companies are in the middle stage. An analysis of the implications for organizations at each stage of the maturity model is presented which will be of value to practising managers. The implications are categorised as impacts on cost, entropy, complexity, flexibility and strategic competitiveness.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and Control: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 2: August, V. (1999). "ERP Sites Hit by Performance Dip," InformationWeek, No. 55, February 17, p. 12.
• 3: Izak Benbasat , Albert S. Dexter , Donald H. Drury , Robert C. Goldstein, A critque of the stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.5, p.476-485, May 1984 [doi>10.1145/358189.358076]
• 4: Bingi, P., Sharma, M. K., and Godla, J. K. (1999). "Critical Issues Affecting An ERP Implementation," Information Systems Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, Summer, pp. 7-14.
• 5: Kristin Braa , Knut H. Rolland, Horizontal Information Systems: Emergent Trends and Perspectives, Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3 International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics, "IF at Home: Virtual Influences on Everyday Life": Information, Technology and Society, p.83-102, June 28-30, 2000
• 6: Marianne Broadbent , Peter Weill , Don St. Clair, The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign, MIS Quarterly, v.23 n.2, p.159-182, June 1999 [doi>10.2307/249750]
• 7: Cambridge Information Network (1999). The Transformation Of ERP: From Money Pit To Money Pot, Cambridge MA: Cambridge Information Network.
• 8: Thomas H. Davenport, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review, v.76 n.4, p.121-131, July-August 1998
• 9: Dolmetsch, R. Huber, T., and Fleisch, E. (1998). Accelerated SAP: 4 Case Studies, Institute For Information Management, Universitat St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
• 10: Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). "Building Theories from Case Study Research," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532-550.
• 11: Galliers, R. D., and Sutherland, A. R. (1991). "Information Systems Management And Strategy Formulation: 'The Stages Of Growth' Model Revisited," Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 89-114.
• 12: Gibson, C. F., and Nolan, R. L. (1974). "Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, January/February, pp.76-88.
• 13: Grover, V. Seung Ryul, J., and Teng, J. T. C. (1998). "Survey of Reengineering Challenges," Information Systems Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, Spring, pp. 53-59.
• 14: Christopher P. Holland , Ben Light, A Critical Success Factors Model For ERP Implementation, IEEE Software, v.16 n.3, p.30-36, May 1999 [doi>10.1109/52.765784]
• 15: Holland C., Light B., and Kawalek P. (1999). "Beyond Enterprise Resource Planning Projects: Innovative Strategies For Competitive Advantage," Proceedings Of The 7th European Conference On Information Systems, Copenhagen, pp. 288-301.
• 16: Holland C., Light B., Beck P., Berdugo Y., Millar R., Press, N., and Setlavad M. (2000). "An International Analysis of the Maturity of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Use," Proceedings of the 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach: Omnipress (CD-ROM).
• 17: John Leslie King , Kenneth L. Kraemer, Evolution and organizational information systems: an assessment of Nolan's stage model, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.5, p.466-475, May 1984 [doi>10.1145/358189.358074]
• 18: KPMG. (1998). Exploiting Packaged Software, London, KPMG.
• 19: Kuldeep Kumar , Jos van Hillegersberg, Enterprise resource planning: introduction, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.4, p.22-26, April 2000 [doi>10.1145/332051.332063]
• 20: Li, C. (1999). "ERP Packages: What's Next?," Information Systems Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, Summer, pp. 31-35.
• 21: Light, B. (1999). "Realizing The Potential of ERP Systems," Electronic Markets, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 238-241.
• 22: Light, B., and Holland, C. (2000). "Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Impacts and Future Directions," in Henderson, P. (ed.), Systems Engineering for Business Process Change, London: Springer.
• 23: Light B., Holland C., Kelly S., and Wills K. (2000). "Best of Breed IT Strategy: An Alternative to Enterprise Resource Planning Systems," Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, 652-659.
• 24: Markus, M. L., and Tanis, C. (2000). "The Enterprise System Experience --- from Adoption to Success," in Zmud, R. W. (ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources.
• 25: M. Lynne Markus , Cornelis Tanis , Paul C. van Fenema, Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.4, p.42-46, April 2000 [doi>10.1145/332051.332068]
• 26: Marion, L. (1999). "Déjà Vu All Over Again: The Return of Time Sharing," Datamation, July. http://www.datamation.com.
• 27: Nolan, L. R. (1979). "Managing the Crisis in Data Processing," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, March-April, pp. 115-126.
• 28: Jeanne Ross, Dow Corning corporation: reengineering global processes, Proceedings of the international conference on Information systems, p.384-386, December 1998, Helsinki, Finland
• 29: David Sprott, Enterprise resource planning: componentizing the enterprise application packages, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.4, p.63-69, April 2000 [doi>10.1145/332051.332074]
• 30: Truex, D., and Ngwenyama, O. K. (2000). "ERP Systems: Facilitating or Confounding Factors in Corporate Telecommunications Mergers?," Proceedings Of The 8th European Conference On Information Systems, Vienna, pp. 645-651.
• 31: Charles Wiseman, Strategy and computers, Dow Jones-Irwin, New York, NY, 1985

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.0 General

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.5 COMPUTER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
      C.5.0 General

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.0 General

Keywords:
ERP, IS evolution, IS maturity, competitive advantage, enterprise resource planning, legacy systems, standard package, standard software, systems implementation