ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A web server's view of the transport layer
Full text PdfPdf (1.23 MB)
Source ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 30 ,  Issue 5  (October 2000) table of contents
SESSION: Papers table of contents
Pages: 10 - 20  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:0146-4833
Author
Mark Allman  NASA Glenn Research Center/BBN Technologies, Cleveland, Ohio
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505672.505674
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents observations of traffic to and from a particular World-Wide Web server over the course a year and a half. This paper presents a longitudinal look at various network path properties, as well as the implementation status of various protocol options and mechanisms. In particular, this paper considers how World-Wide Web clients utilize TCP connections to transfer web data; the deployment of various TCP and HTTP options; the range of round-trip times observed in the network; packet sizes used for WWW transfers; the implications of the measured advertised window sizes; and the impact of using larger initial congestion window sizes. These properties/mechanisms and their implications are explored. An additional goal of this paper is to provide information to help researchers better simulate and emulate realistic networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
{ABF00} Mark Allman, Hari Balakrishnan, and Sally Floyd. Enhancing TCP's Loss Recovery Using Limited Transmit, August 2000. Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tsvwg-limited-xmit-00.txt (work in progress).
2
 
3
{AFP98} Mark Allman, Sally Floyd, and Craig Partridge. Increasing TCP's Initial Window, September 1998. RFC 2414.
4
 
5
{All97} Mark Allman. Fixing Two BSD TCP Bugs. Technical Report CR-204151, NASA Lewis Research Center, October 1997.
6
 
7
{APS99} Mark Allman, Vern Paxson, and W. Richard Stevens. TCP Congestion Control, April 1999. RFC 2581.
 
8
{BPS+98} Hari Balakrishnan, Venkata Padmanabhan, Srinivasan Seshan, Mark Stemm, and Randy Katz. TCP Behavior of a Busy Internet Server: Analysis and Improvements. In IEEE InfoCom, March 1998.
 
9
 
10
{Bra89} Robert Braden. Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers, October 1989. RFC 1122.
 
11
{CFSD88} J. Case, M. Fedor, M. Schoffstall, and J. Davin. A Simple Network Management Protocol, August 1988. RFC 1067.
12
 
13
 
14
{FGM+97} R. Fielding, Jim Gettys, Jeffrey C. Mogul, H. Frystyk, and Tim Berners-Lee. Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1, January 1997. RFC 2068.
15
16
 
17
{Jac90} Van Jacobson. Compressing TCP/IP Headers For Low-Speed Serial Links, February 1990. RFC 1144.
 
18
{JBB92} Van Jacobson, Robert Braden, and David Borman. TCP Extensions for High Performance, May 1992. RFC 1323.
 
19
{JLM89} Van Jacobson, Craig Leres, and Steven McCanne. tcp-dump, June 1989. Available via anonymous FTP from ftp.ee.lbl.gov.
 
20
{KA99} Balachander Krishnamurthy and Martin Arlitt. PROCOW: Protocol Compliance on the Web. Technical Report #990803-05-TM, AT&T Labs, August 1999.
 
21
{KAGT00} Hans Kruse, Mark Allman, Jim Griner, and Diepchi Tran. Experimentation and Modeling of HTTP Over Satellite Channels. International Journal of Satellite Communication, 2000. To appear.
22
 
23
{LK98} Dong Lin and H. T. Kung. TCP Fast Recovery Strategies: Analysis and Improvements. In Proceedings of InfoCom, March 1998.
 
24
 
25
{Mah99} Jamshid Mahdavi. Enabling High Performance Data Transfers on Hosts. Technical report, Pittsburgh Supercomputer Center, June 1999. http://www.psc.edu/networking/perf_tune.html.
 
26
{MMFR96} Matt Mathis, Jamshid Mahdavi, Sally Floyd, and Allyn Romanow. TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options, October 1996. RFC 2018.
27
 
28
{Mor00} Robert Morris. Scalable TCP Congestion Control. In IEEE INFOCOM, March 2000.
 
29
{Ost97} Shawn Ostermann. tcptrace, 1997. Available from http://jarok.cs.ohiou.edu/.
 
30
{PA00} Veto Paxson and Mark Allman. Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer, April 2000. Internet-Draft draft-paxson-tcp-rto-01.txt (work in progress).
 
31
{PAD+99} Vern Paxson, Mark Allman, Scott Dawson, William Fenner, Jim Griner, Ian Heavens, Kevin Lahey, Jeff Semke~ and Bernie Volz. Known TCP Implementation Problems, March 1999. RFC 2525.
 
32
 
33
{PMAM98} Vern Paxson, Jamshid Mahdavi, Andrew Adams, and Matt Mathis. An Architecture for Large-Scale Internet Measurement. IEEE Communications, 1998.
 
34
{Pos81} Jon Postel. Transmission Control Protocol, September 1981. RFC 793.
 
35
{RF99} K. K. Ramakrishnan and Sally Floyd. A Proposal to Add Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP, January 1999. RFC 2481.
36
37
 
38
{TMW97} Kevin Thompson, Gregory Miller, and Rick Wilder. Wide-Area Internet Traffic Patterns and Characteristics. IEEE Network, 11(6):10-23, November/December 1997.
 
39
{ZPS00} Yin Zhang, Vern Paxson, and Scott Shenker. The Stationarity of Internet Path Properties: Routing, Loss and Throughput. Technical report, ACIRI, May 2000.

CITED BY  32