ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance
Full text PdfPdf (341 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 45 ,  Issue 4  (April 2002) table of contents
Supporting community and building social capital
SPECIAL ISSUE: Virtual extension table of contents
Pages: 184 - 192  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Beverly K. Kahn  Suffolk University, Boston, MA
Diane M. Strong  Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA
Richard Y. Wang  Boston University in Boston, MA and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 46,   Downloads (12 Months): 472,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505248.506007
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information quality (IQ) is an inexact science in terms of assessment and benchmarks. Although various aspects of quality and information have been investigated [1, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12], there is still a critical need for a methodology that assesses how well organizations develop information products and deliver information services to consumers. Benchmarks developed from such a methodology can help compare information quality across organizations, and provide a baseline for assessing IQ improvements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
CRG. Information Quality Survey: Administrator's Guide. Cambridge Research Group, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
 
3
Juran, J. M., Gryna, F. M. J., and Bingham, R. S. Quality Control Handbook (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York, NY, 1974.
 
4
Kovac, R., Lee, Y. W., and Pipino, L. L. Total data quality management: the case of IRI. The 1997 Conference on Information Quality (Cambridge, MA, 1997), 63-79.
 
5
McCarthy, E. J. and Perreault, W. D. Basic Marketing: A Global Managerial Approach (Eleventh ed.). Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1995.
 
6
 
7
Reeves, C. A. and Bednar, D. E. Defining quality: alternatives and implications. AMR 19, 3 (1994), 419-445.
 
8
Shostack, G. L. Breaking free from product marketing. Journal of Marketing 41, 2 (1977), 73-80.
9
 
10
Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y. W., Pipino, L. L. and Strong, D. M. Manage your information as a product. Sloan Management Review 39, 4 (Summer 1998), 95-105.
 
11
Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12, 4 (1996), 5-34.
 
12
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. Free Press, New York, NY, 1990.

CITED BY  12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Beverly K. Kahn: colleagues
Diane M. Strong: colleagues
Richard Y. Wang: colleagues